100 Million US-Americans Don't VotePosted by Sonja Bonin in US Domestic and Cultural Issues on Monday, March 17. 2008 While the American primaries make the headlines on a daily basis even in our Swiss newspapers, more than a hundred million Americans usually don't vote, which means about 40% of eligible voters forego their right to elect who's to become (arguably) the most powerful political leader in the world. Find an interesting "mini-movie" about these missing voters here. This is what the filmmakers write about themselves:
"You usually end up with [a] disproportionate number of minorities not voting and more young voters not voting," according to Project Vote, a not-for profit organization that tries to get more people to vote. Also featured in the movie: Thomas E. Patterson, Harvard professor and author of the book The Vanishing Voter (Amazon.com; Amazon.de). His conclusion is very clear:
Historically, only 10-20 % of all eligible voters take part in the primaries that are occupying so much of our attention at the moment. Oh, and by the way, guess which country besides the US has a very low turn-out on election day? Correct: it's Switzerland. The First Big Book On The Credit CrunchPosted by Sonja Bonin in International Economics, US Domestic and Cultural Issues on Wednesday, March 12. 2008 According to the Economist, Charles Morris is the first to really assess the current crisis of the financial market in his book The Trillion Dollar Meltdown:
In addition, the "Federal Reserve fuelled the housing boom by sharply cutting the cost of short-term money. Mr Greenspan ignored warnings about subprime excess, while eagerly championing 'new paradigms', from hybrid mortgages to credit derivatives." As for the solution: He offers a raft of suggestions: originators should retain the riskiest portion of securitised loans; prime brokers should stop lending to hedge funds that fail to disclose their balance sheets; trading of credit derivatives should be brought onto exchanges for the sake of safety, even if this raises costs; and some version of the old Glass-Steagall act, which separated commercial banking and capital-markets activities, should be re-introduced. Ultimately, he argues, after a quarter-century of “market dogmatism” it is time for the regulatory pendulum to swing the other way. Howard Zinn's "A People's History Of The United States" in GermanPosted by Sonja Bonin in Fulbright, US Domestic and Cultural Issues on Tuesday, December 11. 2007 Looking for a Christmas present? Here’s a hint: Atlantic Review editor Sonja Bonin has translated Howard Zinn's bestseller "A People's History of the United States" into German. Her translation was presented at the Frankfurt book fair this fall and selected second-best non-fiction book on the highly esteemed recommendation list (“Bestenliste”) by NDR, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Buchjournal and Börsenblatt in October. Howard Zinn’s classic, which was first published in English in 1980 and has reached more than one million readers so far, has become an all-time favorite of both students and the intellectual left in the US. The octogenerian author, a historian, WWII-veteran and civil rights activist, has become quite famous in the US, but (unlike his friend and occasional co-author Noam Chomsky) is not well-known outside America yet. Zinn’s German publisher, Schwarzer Freitag in Berlin, is run by German Fulbright Alumnus Andreas Freitag. You can order the book directly via the publishers or support the Atlantic Review by ordering it on Amazon.de. Schwarzer Freitag has also published the DVD “You Can’t Be Neutral On A Moving Train”, a documentary about Howard Zinn with German subtitles. For more information on Howard Zinn, visit Wikipedia (German, English) or the following websites: www.howardzinn.org; www.howardzinn.de. Kosovo: Is the EU Home Alone in the Balkans?Posted by Joerg Wolf in Transatlantic Relations on Tuesday, December 11. 2007 The UN deadline for negotiations between Serbs and Kosovars expired today. Writing for the Washington Post (Nov. 23), Richard Holbrooke predicted this failure and expressed his pessimism regarding the Balkans' future: The United States and most of the European Union (led by Britain, France and Germany) will recognize Kosovo quickly. Russia and its allies will not. Kosovo's eight-year run as the biggest-ever U.N. project will end with great tension and a threat of violence that could spread to Bosnia. A bit "hidden" in brackets within a paragraph full of praise for Clinton's Balkan's achieve and criticism for Bush's neglect of the region, Holbrooke opines:
I have a lot of respect for Dick Holbrooke, who negotiated the Dayton Accords and wrote the terrific book "To End a War" (Amazon.com, Amazon.de). The book was so well written, it reads like a good thriller. But: Is Holbrooke right about that "terrible mistake"? Is the EU force still to weak or can the EU manage to send in sufficient reinforcements, as promised? In 1991, soon after the start of the Yugoslav civil war, Luxembourg's foreign minister Jacques Poos thought that Europe could stop the fighting on its own and famously declared: "This is the hour of Europe." I wonder how much has changed in the last decade and a half? Given the little European support for Iraq and Afghanistan, quite a number of Americans have said that the United States should not come to the rescue of the West Europeans the next time they (we) get into trouble. Will the Bush administration indeed stay out of this issue, if -- or rather: when -- the s*** hits the fan? I doubt it, because President Bush has been pretty vocal regarding Kosovo independence and expressed concern about Russian sphere's of influence. The Return of FearPosted by Editors in International Economics on Tuesday, November 27. 2007 This is a guest blog post by Don, who lives and works in England: I am an expat American who has been a staunch advocate of free-market capitalism for many years, and still mostly believe that. In recent years I have come to believe that the pressures of globalisation have opened certain fissures in the free-market model and have come to better appreciate certain aspects of the welfare state. I have come to see definate advantages to certain aspects of the welfare state over the past few years as I've come to know the National Health Service (NHS) better and have observed the problems that Americans have with the health care insurance system in the US while being thankful that I don't have to deal with it personally. British historian Tony Judt wrote an essay masquerading as a book review in the New York Review of Books which contains some interesting analysis. It is a review of Robert Reich's recent book: "Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life" (Amazon.com, Amazon.de). Judt first takes Reich to task for penning a trenchant critique of the current state of the world but wimping out in the end by refusing to identify the villains of the story, but his most interesting point comes late in the book review when Judt writes about the return of fear to the citizenry of Western countries:
I agree. In the case of the US I might add the fear of being overwhelmed by illegal immigrants and the fear of losing one's property due to catastrophic health problems. I think this deserves some discussion. Related post in the Atlantic Review: Using the United States to Scare Germans Transatlantic Dialogues in BerlinPosted by Sonja Bonin in Transatlantic Relations on Sunday, September 23. 2007
"Europe has to lead and America will follow," according to Jeremy Rifkin, author of the recent best-seller The European Dream. How Europe's Vision of the Future Is Quietly Eclipsing the American Dream. (Original: Amazon.com; Amazon.de; Deutsche Übersetzung: Amazon.de;) Rifkin recently spoke at the House of World Cultures in Berlin as part of the Transatlantic Dialogues series. Find more information on the program and on Rifkin's book as well as an open blog for discussion here.
For a review of The European Dream by Tony Judt see The New York Review of Books. WSJ Recommends Books about GermanyPosted by Joerg Wolf in German Politics on Tuesday, July 3. 2007
The Wall Street Journal lets Harvard Professor Steven Ozment list five books that "excel in their portraits of Germany and the German people." Via Clive Davis.
I have not read any of these books, thus I can't comment on them. Question to readers: How much can history books (like those recommended by the WSJ) help to understand today's Germany and the Germans? Farewell, Hello, Mr VonnegutPosted by Sonja Bonin in Transatlantic Relations on Thursday, April 26. 2007
On April 11th, Kurt Vonnegut, “one of the defining voices of post-war America”, as The Economist calls him, died at the age of 84. He was the son of an American father and a German mother and witnessed the fire-bombing of Dresden in 1945 as a prisoner of war there.
“Although Mr Vonnegut's experience in Dresden shaped his world view, it took him 24 years and seven novels before he wrote the “famous Dresden book” he had promised. “Slaughterhouse-Five” (Amazon.com, Amazon.de), published in 1969 against the backdrop of racial unrest and the Vietnam war, propelled him from science-fiction writer (a label he abhorred) to literary icon,” the Economist continues in its obituary. It is this novel, The Guardian further elaborates, that “contained the phrase that became most closely associated with him and that could most fittingly serve as his epitaph: 'So it goes.' The words recur throughout the book each time a death is recorded. “Slaughterhouse-Five” reached No. 1 on best-seller lists, making Mr. Vonnegut a cult hero”, and ‘so it goes’ became a catchphrase for opponents of the Vietnam war,” adds the New York Times. Showing his typical dark humor, Kurt Vonnegut himself wrote in an introduction for a special edition of his most famous work ten years after its first publication: The Dresden atrocity, tremendously expensive and meticulously planned, was so meaningless, finally, that only one person on the entire planet got any benefit from it. I am that person. I wrote this book, which earned a lot of money for me and made my reputation, such as it is. One way or another, I got two or three dollars for every person killed. Some business I’m in.Let’s hope that Kurt Vonnegut’s death has one single benefit, too: causing lots of people to (re-) read his fabulous book. The Flaws of Some Anti-Anti-AmericanismPosted by Joerg Wolf in Transatlantic Relations on Wednesday, March 14. 2007
Andrew Hammel has reviewed Andrei Markovits' latest book "Uncoth Nation," which identifies "three pitfalls of anti-anti-Americanism:"
1. Defensive denial/Complete identification. The anti-anti-American becomes so fed up with the supercilious tone of European anti-Americanism (or so afraid of "giving the other side ammunition") that he defends U.S. policy even against spot-on critiques.Andrew Hammel's excellent review is at German Joys. The Atlantic Review has written about Markovits' new book in the posts Anti-Americanism and Anti-Semitism and How Widespread is Anti-Americanism? Stay tuned for more comments and reviews of Prof. Markovits' new book in the next few weeks. Hari's Conclusion About the Popularity of the Eurabia MythPosted by Joerg Wolf in Transatlantic Relations on Tuesday, March 13. 2007
British writer Johann Hari reviews Mark Steyn's latest book about the "Eurabia" prediction. Andrew Hammel points out the popularity of the "Eurabia" prediction among American Europe-bashers and ends his post in German Joys with Hari's conclusion:
It is a startling indictment of the intellectual standards of the American right that they have welcomed this Eurabian fiction with anything other than cheap, repulsed laughter.Related post in the Atlantic Review: "Eurabia" and "US Prophets of Europe's Doom are Half Wrong". UPDATE: I have changed the headline due to comments from our readers. Original headline was: "What the Eurabia Myth Might Say About the American Right" The State of Emergency InfrastructurePosted by Joerg Wolf in German Politics, US Domestic and Cultural Issues on Saturday, March 10. 2007
"Snow grinds global empire to halt," wrote FP Passport on March 7, 2007:
When Hitler rained bombs on London for more than 50 consecutive nights in the fall of 1940, Londoners responded by tacking up "Business As Usual" signs on the city's streets. Life went on, and the Blitz be damned. Contrast that to this morning, when a light dusting of snow—less than one-eighth of an inch—fell on Washington. It was apparently too much for our federal government to handle. Business couldn't continue. On the floor of the U.S. Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid struggled to explain why the chamber was helpless in the face of a dusting of snow. Taking a vote on a homeland security measure would have to wait.FP Passport makes tongue-in-cheek comments about terrorists getting cloud seeding technology and a pre-emptive strike against China. I am not linking to this American blog to make fun of Washington. Rather it seems appropriate to point out the vulnerability and lack of emergency preparedness, which US and German experts have assessed in some detail: • GERMANY: The Third Risk Report by the Advisory Board for Civil Protection ("Dritter Gefahrenbericht der Schutzkommission") presented to the German Interior Minister on 26 March 2006 "gives an assessment of both the broad spectrum of imminent threats facing Germany and the provisions needed to meet them. In this report, expert consideration of possible future events is investigated, a distinction between ABC and other types of risks is made, and a systematic assessment of existing gaps, or deficiencies, in emergency preparedness and response is carried out." The six "most imperative gaps, or deficiencies," are: Continue reading "The State of Emergency Infrastructure" Transatlantic Foreign Policy Attitudes and Threat PerceptionsPosted by Joerg Wolf in Transatlantic Relations on Thursday, February 8. 2007
The graphic below is from Transatlantic Trends Survey of the German Marshall Fund of the United States. The perception of various threats does not seem to be very different in the United States and Europe. Certainly the differences are not so big to suggest that Europeans and Americans do not share many common interests anymore, as more and more bloggers claim these days.
![]()
Transatlantic Trends: Key Findings (pdf) and Narrated Slide Presentation. The German weekly Die Zeit summarizes the findings as well. Related: Prof. Drezner of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University discusses the assumption of American exceptionalism in his book review "Mind the Gap" for the The National Interest. The first book is Andrew Kohut and Bruce Stokes' America Against the World (Amazon.com, Amazon.de), which "compares and contrasts the attitudes of Americans and other nationalities, relying primarily on the Pew Global Attitudes project. The second is Benjamin Page and Marshall Bouton's The Foreign Policy Disconnect (Amazon.com, Amazon.de), which compares and contrasts the attitudes of Americans and foreign policymaking elites." The book review in The National Interest is available for free, but Dr. Drezner also has an excerpt on his blog "Taking exception to American exceptionalism?": In detailing the patterns and gaps between the American public and others, these books nicely complement and occasionally contradict each other. Both The Foreign Policy Disconnect and America Against the World will add grist to the mill for those who profess faith in the wisdom of crowds and doubts about the judgment of foreign policy experts. After cogitating on both books, it would be difficult for the informed reader to believe that Americans hold irrational or flighty views about foreign policy. Most Americans, on most issues, articulate what George W. Bush characterized as a "humble" foreign policy during the 2000 campaign. They want a prudent foreign policy based on security against attacks and threats to domestic well-being—though American attitudes about multilateralism remain an open question. The gaps between American attitudes and the rest of the world are overstated; the gaps between Americans and their policymakers might be understated. The biggest question—which neither of these books answers satisfactorily—is to what extent these views, and gaps between views, matter.Emphasis in bold added, because I think this is important for the frequent debates about transatlantic disagreements. Related: Prof. Drezner December 2006 article in the Washington Post: "The Grandest Strategy Of Them All."
(Page 1 of 4, totaling 38 entries)
next page »
|
SponsorTips From Our Readers
The above links on transatlantic issues have been recommended by trusted readers. More information about this web 2.0 project ;-)
SUPPORT THIS SITEGoogle the SiteHot TopicsClick on one of the following links to see all Atlantic Review posts about this topic in a chronological order with the latest post on top:
Afghanistan Anti-Americanism Economics Iran Iraq Merkel Polls Terrorism Click here for the full list of all topics. Read posts from specific Atlantic Review authorsBlogroll
|
Home - About Us - Newsletter - Transatlantic Relations - US Foreign Policy - Various RSS Feeds Designed for Atlantic Review by Carl.

Latest Comments
I can agree to the observation that the younger generation is less forthcoming to [...]
African_Princess about Racism in Germany
Mar 21 2008, 3:09 pm I am half German, Half South African (White German dad and [...]
Zyme about Top Four Arms Exporters: USA, Russia, Germany and France
I had a different reason to assume you wouldn´t like the idea. People who don´t know [...]
Joe Noory about Top Four Arms Exporters: USA, Russia, Germany and France
If you're a law clerk (a lawyer or someone trained in law working for a judge), then [...]
Reid of America about Top Four Arms Exporters: USA, Russia, Germany and France
The data from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute’s (SIPRI) seems to be [...]
Joe Noory about Top Four Arms Exporters: USA, Russia, Germany and France
do you think that "droits de l'homme" are so well respected there ? No, I [...]
Pat Patterson about Top Four Arms Exporters: USA, Russia, Germany and France
Yeah, I was looking for a similar time span, two years seems too short to give any [...]
franchie about Top Four Arms Exporters: USA, Russia, Germany and France
oh my gawd, misinterpretation