|
< Previous Post | Next Post >
"The Strongest Trans-Atlantic Relations..."Posted by Joerg Wolf in Transatlantic Relations on Sunday, December 30. 2007 Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee accused the Bush administration of having an "arrogant bunker mentality" on foreign policy. Secretary Rice responded:
Phillip Carter over at Intel Dump believes "Condi succumbs to the Kool-Aid:"
I basically agree, except for the last sentence, which is far too black and white, even for provocative closing words. It sounds too much like: You either love us or if you don't, you apparently must hate us. (Related post in the Atlantic Review: The Anti-Americans and the Manichaean Narcissists.) IMHO Anti-American sentiment on the street should not be used as the main indicator of how good or bad transatlantic relations are. BBQs between our heads of government should not be used as the main indicator either. Instead, all that counts is how well we cooperate regarding Afghanistan, climate change, Middle East, trade, counter-terrorism, Kosovo etc. And here, I believe, cooperation is not as strong as it could and should be. But, let's face it: Have Europe and the US ever cooperated that much on such a wide range of global issues? During the Cold War transatlantic cooperation was limited to a few policy areas. European and American leaders did not bother themselves with doing something about climate change. NATO did not send 20,000 troops to some far away country. Today's transatlantic agenda is longer than it ever was before. Perhaps that is what Secretary Rice was referring to. Therefore it is okay, that we do not agree on everything. Welcome! You are reading the ATLANTIC REVIEW -- a Press Digest on Transatlantic Relations combined with commentary and analysis by three young professionals from Germany, the Netherlands and the United States. More about us. The horizontal menu bar at the top helps to navigate this site. Subscribe to one of our RSS-Feeds or to our newsletter, which is emailed twice per month.Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
chirol
- #1 - 2007-12-30 16:26 -
"Today's transatlantic agenda is longer than it ever was before. Perhaps that is what Secretary Rice was referring to. Therefore it is okay, that we do not agree on everything." Comment (1)
David
- #2 - 2007-12-30 20:23 -
Huckabee is spot-on in his criticism. I like the way he is shaking up the Republican Party. Comment (1)
Kevin Sampson
- #3 - 2007-12-30 21:13 -
'IMHO Anti-American sentiment on the street should not be used as the main indicator of how good or bad transatlantic relations are.' Comments (3)
Joerg - Atlantic Review
- #3.1 - 2007-12-30 21:41 -
Neither Germany nor the US is a "direct democracy." There many legitimate reasons why the popular will of the people is often ignored. Comments (3)
Kevin Sampson
- #3.1.1 - 2007-12-30 22:01 -
'Sure, but Anti-Americanism is not one of the top 20 issues, that makes people vote for a certain candidate/party.' Comments (3)
Joerg - Atlantic Review
- #3.1.1.1 - 2007-12-30 23:54 -
QUOTE: "It got Shroeder elected." He got a few extra votes because of it. And this time those few extra votes mattered. That's all. Nothing more, nothing less. Check this out: "It takes a robust sense of self-importance to assume that national elections on the other side of the Atlantic are nothing more than referenda on relations with America." QUOTE: "OK, enlighten me. What are we doing together?" Please read my post again. QUOTE: "And the video clip is pathetic, Joerg." Oh, really? Yeah, congratulations for getting the irony. Perhaps you could now respond to my above question surrounding that video clip: "If you consider the Anti-American rhetoric on the street important, then what do you make of these interviews with the ordinary men and women on US streets?" QUOTE: "you think they might have cherry-picked those responses?" Yeah, right, when Europeans or -- in this case -- Australians interview Americans on the street, then the respondents are all cherry-picked just like the audience of a Bush townhall meeting. If, however, Americans interview European or Arabs on the street than it is always an accurate representation of what "the Arab street" or the Europeans think. I have quoted Intel Dump in the above post: "Maybe underneath all that anti-American sentiment and rhetoric on the streets of Europe." How does he know about the Anti-American sentiment? Perhaps by "documentaries" full of cherry-picked Europeans. See the link in my post to "The Anti-Americans and the Manichaean Narcissists." Comments (3)
Kevin Sampson
- #3.1.1.1.1 - 2007-12-31 04:52 -
‘He got a few extra votes because of it. And this time those few extra votes mattered. That's all. Nothing more, nothing less.’ Comments (3)
Tuomas
- #3.1.1.1.1.1 - 2007-12-31 08:28 -
I believe you to be misinformed with regard to what made Schröder elected, and in particular with regard to the differences between the main opponents in that election on the point of German participation in an invasion of Iraq, but if you have any relevant sources, why not to present them? Comments (2)
SC
- #4 - 2007-12-30 21:33 -
"During the Cold War transatlantic cooperation was limited to a few policy areas." Comments (9)
Don S
- #4.1 - 2007-12-31 00:57 -
Excellent points, SC. The WTO, World Bank, IMF, and many of the UN organisations matter and have seriously shaped our world. Comments (2)
SC
- #4.1.1 - 2007-12-31 05:16 -
Thank you, Don. The organizations you list are very much products of transatlantic cooperation and define many of the rules of the game these days. Those organizations and rules have come to distinguish the post-1945 world from what preceded it. They even form the framework in which, it is to be hoped, China manages a "soft landing" as it's economy and political system slowly modernize. Comments (9)
Don S
- #4.1.1.1 - 2008-01-03 11:03 -
SC, the point that many miss is that there is a fundamental problem in the European efforts promoting more or less 'pure' multilateralism. Comments (2)
SC
- #4.1.1.1.1 - 2008-01-04 07:25 -
Heh! Well, I've been saying for some time now, that Europeans generally will have their chance, in a number of areas, to take the lead in the coming years. To begin with, whether we stay or leave Iraq and Afghanistan, it will be very hard for the next President to summon support for any projection of hard power for some new purpose, and if all the writing on this site is indicative of fact, there is little "soft power" to expend for some grand international design. Comments (9)
Tuomas
- #5 - 2007-12-31 03:24 -
Words from diplomats and foreign ministers (and "secretaries" of countries run like the US) are uttered with an intention, but they are not intended to be analyzed as if they were spoken by scholars. Comments (2)
Dr who
- #6 - 2008-01-03 05:53 -
Thank you for an interesting debate. Comments (10)
Pat Patterson
- #6.1 - 2008-01-03 07:46 -
What's the set term for "hubris" in Australia? It's seems odd to imply that Howard was brought down for kowtowing to Americans after doing so for eleven years. That's the second longest term in Australian history. That's like Pliny the Younger claiming that the eruptions at Pompeii and Herculaneum were signs of the impdending collapse of the Roman Empire. He was eventually right 250 years later. Comments (6)
dr who
- #6.1.1 - 2008-01-04 04:58 -
Dear Pat, Comments ()
SC
- #6.1.1.1 - 2008-01-04 06:38 -
Interesting. I'm curious how it is that all or most Australians have come by the prejudice regarding Americans which you ascribe to them. I'm also curious about the following statement: "The truth is that in Australia, there has always been anti american feeling here but recent years have seen it finally emerge as an open sentiment and really politicians and their lackeys on both sides of the Pacific have been living in a fools paradise on how much 'The Aussies love the Yanks and vice versa'". Comments (9)
Dr who
- #6.1.1.1.1 - 2008-01-04 07:15 -
Dear SC, Comments (10)
SC
- #6.1.1.1.1.1 - 2008-01-04 08:01 -
"As for the U.S people, again its common knowledge here that most 'yanks' know practically nothing about Australia, Comments (9)
Dr who
- #6.1.1.1.1.1.1 - 2008-01-07 06:01 -
My Dear SC, Comments (10)
SC
- #6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 - 2008-01-07 21:26 -
Well, we now seem to be off by ourselves on this little thread. And yes, you certainly have devoted more than a small number of keystrokes to the matter at hand. Let me respond to your last question first: No, the man was not pulling my leg; he was indeed confused as subsequent conversation revealed. He was also not the only person to make this mistake in the UK. I might add that I have found this confusion in the US as well, as I'm sure will not surprise you, and also with people of other nationalities in other places. Geographic ignorance? Perhaps, but there are other explanations. Widespread? Hard to say. Offended by these encounters? No; and I can speak for my wife as well as myself on this. Comments (9)
Dr who
- #6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 - 2008-01-08 06:40 -
My Dear SC. Comments (10)
SC
- #6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 - 2008-01-08 15:44 -
No, I am not "logically inconsistent" in my application of the definition of prejudice. I shall end by simply noting that the standards implicit in your writing for drawing conclusions about the nature of whole peoples and their culture would have found a warm welcome in many parts of the US, but in particular the American south, prior to the 1960's. In this way, if no other, you would have fit right in then - and in many parts of the world extant. Comments (9)
Dr who
- #6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 - 2008-01-09 04:56 -
Well SC it seems we've reached the natural differential dissonance in our respective outlooks. Comments (10)
SC
- #6.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 - 2008-01-10 09:23 -
Epilog: Well, I thought I would check this thread one last time. I've known a few Australians in my time who liked a good gag. If your writing is reflective of your speech, you would indeed be unique among them. Which is only to say that I remain suspicious that yours continues to be one extended leg pull, as I wrote earlier. Comments (9)
Pat Patterson
- #6.1.1.2 - 2008-01-04 06:48 -
"...historical juxtapositional patina..."? To paraphrase Gen. Browning, "I think we may be going an adjective too far." Comments (6)
Dr who
- #7 - 2008-01-04 07:22 -
Hello Pat, Comments (10)
Pat Patterson
- #8 - 2008-01-04 21:43 -
Just in case the impression was left that there was a sea change in Australia after the last election, The Age, a mass market Australian newspaper, cautions that the margin was only 1.5% between Labour and the Coalition. So divided government seems to be the norm at least in Australia and the US. And it's also noteworthy that some of the areas where Labour is strongest may lose seats due to population changes in the next two years. Comments (6)
Dr who
- #8.1 - 2008-01-07 05:07 -
Dear Pat, Comments (10)
Pat Patterson
- #9 - 2008-01-08 14:44 -
Not really, I was just trying to point out that in terms of numbers this change is not really enough to sustain itself if Labour acts precipitously outside of a few policy positions. The wishful thinking may be on your part as I notice you made no reference to the 2010 reapportionment, any of the contents of The Age's argument or in fact referred to anything other than "...what some people believe." Comments (6)
Dr who
- #9.1 - 2008-01-09 05:24 -
Pat, Comments (10)
Pat Patterson
- #10 - 2008-01-09 06:47 -
Yes, indeed the swing could either way but if the AEC allows for a plus or minus of 3.5% the swing could be huge. The AEC home page does not make any claim of making elections as fair as possible in regard to the quota but rather to the actual mechanics of voting. Comments (6)
dr who
- #10.1 - 2008-01-09 07:44 -
Just before I go today, I concede my typing is hurried and errors creep in, but its disingenuious to use that as some kind of 'argument' and I don't need a lecture on Latin expression thank youPat. Comments ()
Pat Patterson
- #11 - 2008-01-09 13:25 -
You missed my point about Australian activities in Asia as without US support or basically carte blanche Australia would have to face an aggresive China or Japan seeking to extend their influence among what they might see as their natural allies. In other words no more troops to East Timor, Tonga, the Solomons, etc. Plus I always thought that the Australia's blunting Japan's advance into New Guinea and providing the bulk of the infantry where the main reasons Australia remained free. While the total elimination of Japan was mainly done by the United States. That's the first time I've heard that America saved Australia since I was only referring to the fact that Australia, more isolationist then the US at that time, was badly prepared to meet Japanese aggression and had to evacuate Darwin. Comments (6)
SC
- #11.1 - 2008-01-10 18:23 -
"Jacques Derrida may really be dead but obviously only in a contextual way." Comments (9)
Only registered users may post comments here. Get your own account here and then log into this blog. Your browser must support cookies.
The author does not allow comments to this entry
We appreciate any thoughtful comment!
Would you like to read more? Have a look at our directory of Atlantic Review posts. Or check out the constantly updated reading recommendations from our readers in the sidebar: "Tips From Our Readers." More information on this project in this post. Feel free to comment on any article recommended in the sidebar. BBCode format allowed. You can make a clickable link with this code: If you write "[url=http://america-germany.atlanticreview.org]Carnival of US-German Relations[/url]", then this will be displayed: "Carnival of US-German Relations". And if you write "[url]http://atlanticreview.org/mustreads.html[/url]", then this will be displayed: "http://atlanticreview.org/mustreads.html" |
Contact UsEmail Joerg Wolf, Nanne Zwagerman, Kyle Atwell and Andrew Zvirzdin at:
ar-team AT atlanticreview.org We are available for interviews, and appreciate feedback and suggestions. SponsorLatest Comments
David about Thousands of Classified Reports on the Afghanistan War Leaked
The WikiLeaks documents have accelerated the calls in Germany for immediate [...]Comments () Pat Patterson about Thousands of Classified Reports on the Afghanistan War Leaked What McChrystal scandal? Once the aticle came out virtually no one spoke in his [...]Comments () Marie Claude about Thousands of Classified Reports on the Afghanistan War Leaked http://www.fredthompsonshow.co m/b/Fred-Talks-Wikileaks-with- Fomer-CIA-Director-Gen.-M [...]Comments () Marie Claude about Thousands of Classified Reports on the Afghanistan War Leaked After McChrystall scandal... whaat's next ? looks like the American population [...]Comments () Marie Claude about Anti-European Schadenfreude Rising? joe you are more german than a German LMAO but I notice that this article is [...]Comments () Joerg Wolf about Thousands of Classified Reports on the Afghanistan War Leaked "What is the reaction in Germany?" Some concern about Task Force 373, but not [...]Comments () Tips From Our Readers
The above links on transatlantic issues have been recommended by trusted readers. More information about this web 2.0 project ;-)
BlogrollSUPPORT THIS SITEGoogle the SiteHot TopicsClick on one of the following links to see all Atlantic Review posts about this topic in a chronological order with the latest post on top:
Afghanistan Anti-Americanism Economics Iran Iraq Merkel Polls Terrorism Click here for the full list of all topics. Read posts from specific Atlantic Review authorsAdRead all about Quicktrim weight loss, and other wrinkle treatments.
|
Home - About Us - Newsletter - Transatlantic Relations - US Foreign Policy - Various RSS Feeds Designed for Atlantic Review by Carl.

