|
< Previous Post | Next Post >
Saturday, April 21. 2007Two More Americans Accuse Germany of Historical RevisionismPosted by Joerg Wolf in Transatlantic Relations on Saturday, April 21. 2007
David Rivkin and Lee A. Casey, who served in the U.S. Justice Department under Presidents Reagan and George H. W. Bush, wrote the op-ed "German for Chutzpah" in the Wall Street Journal on April 16, 2007. Access for subscribers only, but a reprint is available at History News Network. The authors start with:
Call it a humanitarian offensive, or call it historical revisionism, but Germany is on the march again. Seventeen years after German reunification, and 61 after top Nazis were condemned at the Nuremberg Trials, Berlin is taking a newly assertive role in attempting to define permissible international conduct. Although German Chancellor Angela Merkel claims that there is no effort to "reinterpret" Germany's checkered history, the evidence suggests a determined campaign at rehabilitation.They consider for instance Germany's initiative "to promote a new version of its own highly restrictive 'Holocaust denial' laws across Europe" as "actually trivializing" Germany's own "crimes against the Jews." Does anyone agree with this peculiar line of thought? Why do they read mean intentions into this? Just like Tyler Cowen, who accuses Germany of "whitewashing the past" because of two movies about defiance against the Nazis (Sophie Scholl) and against the East German Stasi system (The Lives of Others), see the Atlantic Review post Historical Revisionism in Germany? This post attracted many interesting comments: An excerpt from Bill L' comment: Responsibility was never owned. It was all dumped on the Nazis. The Solution of Caiaphas. Germany's repentance was to point the finger at a small segment of their society and say, "They did it. They are the ones to blame. We are innocent."I don't think that is the case. Bill, I think you are confusing Germany with Austria. Germans have faced their awful past in a much more honest and soul searching way than the Japanese or Austrians or Russians. Fuchur has brought a great example in one of his comments: Undoubtedly, dealing with such a painful and dark chapter in history as the Nazi era is an immensely difficult task. But overall, I think Germany has done a pretty good job. Here's an example that came to my mind: A few years ago, a proposal was put forth to name a school in my vicinity the "von Stauffenberg Gymnasium", after one of the "heroes" of July 20th 44. It was turned down, mainly on initiative of the history teachers, who pointed out that the role of von Stauffenberg and his accomplices had been quite questionable in the long years leading up to 1944. IMO that reveals a high level of awareness, and it is not at all the blind hero-worshipping that Cowen feels to perceive. It is not at all the black-and-white "the Germans against the evil Nazis"-view that you accuse Germans of. Instead, it shows a very distinctive and mature approach.Excerpt from GM Roper's interesting comment: My grandfather was an ethnic German, I was born in Germany, though my parent's were American and as a a child in the United States, I remember being called a Nazi by kids who were only acting as kids act and repeating the crap of their parents.Back to the Wall Street Journal piece: Messr. Rivkin and Casey end their op-ed by accusing Germany "to obtain a measure of the victim status that, in the modern world, has become a necessary badge of moral authority. That, of course, is how rehabilitation works." I agree to the extent that there is more talk about German victims than there was before, but I don't think this means that Germany aims to have a "victim status." Related post in the Atlantic Review: • Germans said to be more afraid to kill than to get killed • Historical Comparisons: Fritz Stern Publishes "Five Germanys I Have Known" • Bad News from Germany Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Zyme
- #1 - 2007-04-21 14:18 - (Reply)
"Two More Americans Accuse Germany of Historical Revisionism" Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #1.1 - 2007-04-21 17:22 - (Reply)
I care for the same reason, which makes many Americans care about Anti-Americanism in the European media. Comments ()
David
- #2 - 2007-04-21 18:04 - (Reply)
I also oppose criminalizing Holocaust deniers, but Rivkin and Casey make it sound like a diabolical German plot. In fact, there is widespread EU support for this. Comments ()
2020
- #3 - 2007-04-22 06:43 - (Reply)
Quote: "Germans have faced their awful past in a much more honest and soul searching way than the Japanese or Austrians or Russians." Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #3.1 - 2007-04-22 08:53 - (Reply)
True, but that has changed after unification. Comments ()
Shah Alexander
- #4 - 2007-04-22 16:15 - (Reply)
I am surprised to read this post and "Historical Revisionism in Germany?". Actually, revisionism is rising moderately in Japan, as you understand recent dispute on comfort women during WWII. Comments ()
Zyme
- #4.1 - 2007-04-22 18:12 - (Reply)
Maybe people think so much about WW2 because before (and during) that war, every major industrial power also was a major military power in the world and was used to military interferences once in a while. Comments ()
Fuchur
- #4.1.1 - 2007-04-22 20:51 - (Reply)
How does the saying go: You can provide people with arguments, but you can't force them to think?! Comments ()
Zyme
- #4.1.1.1 - 2007-04-23 00:14 - (Reply)
Half a century of peace - created by the biggest military arsenals in mankindīs history. And tell me - was it the peaceful economical powers that had the biggest influence during those decades? Comments ()
Pat Patterson
- #5 - 2007-04-23 03:26 - (Reply)
Historical revisionism is necessary for any free society to learn of its past. As new information becomes available, or sometimes even new interpretations of old data, a better understanding of an individual nations history or even its national myths can become clearer and more truthful. Comments ()
Don S
- #6 - 2007-04-24 19:16 - (Reply)
A quote from Rifkin-Casey "Call it a humanitarian offensive, or call it historical revisionism, but Germany is on the march again" Comments ()
|
Contact UsEmail Joerg Wolf and Kyle Atwell at:
ar-team AT atlanticreview.org We are available for interviews, and appreciate feedback and suggestions. Subscribe and FollowWelcome!
You are reading the ATLANTIC REVIEW, a Press Digest on Transatlantic Relations combined with commentary and analysis. More about us. Follow Atlantic Review on Facebook or on Twitter. Subscribe to one of our RSS-Feeds or to our newsletter. SponsorSUPPORT THIS SITEBlogrollHot TopicsClick on one of the following links to see all Atlantic Review posts about this topic in a chronological order with the latest post on top:
Afghanistan Anti-Americanism Economics Iran Iraq Merkel Polls Terrorism Click here for the full list of all topics. |
Home - About Us - Newsletter - Transatlantic Relations - US Foreign Policy - Various RSS Feeds Designed for Atlantic Review by Carl.

