Monday, January 8. 2007
Posted by Editors in
International Economics, Transatlantic Relations on Monday, January 8. 2007
The American Institute of Contemporary Studies has compiled a page of links to German and American press reports regarding Chancellor Angela Merkel's extremely short visit to Washington, D.C., on January 4, 2007. The International Herald Tribune (IHT) points out that President Bush was "conspicuously silent about Merkel's bilateral trade proposal": Merkel called on Europe and the United States to improve trade cooperation to withstand the challenge of Asian economies. She proposed harmonization in some areas, ranging from technical standards for patents to regulations governing financial markets. But some European officials were skeptical about the proposals. "This is unlikely to get off the ground," said an official, who spoke on the customary condition of anonymity. "The Americans aren't keen on it, and creating a new free-trade area of sorts is way too ambitious." Trans-Atlantic trade relations are in a fragile state after talks to reduce barriers to global commerce broke down in July. The United States and Europe have failed to agree on cuts in farm subsidies and industrial tariffs that are essential to concluding a World Trade Organization agreement on liberalization, known as the Doha round. The IHT also explains the difficulties of the Doha round of trade talks and states that "efforts to clinch a trade deal could prove more difficult following the recent Congressional victory by the Democrats, who traditionally have more protectionist instincts than the Republicans."Christoph von Marschall explains in Der Tagesspiegel (in German) that Merkel is not proposing an ambitious Transatlantic Free Trade Area (TAFTA), but common technical standards and patent laws so that European and American companies do not need to please two bureaucracies. This is expected to increase trade. Von Marshall sees the problem that the EU and the US would try to force their standards on each other for reasons of prestige and suggests that it would be better if the EU and the US would just accept each others standards: If the US considers a new child safety seat safe, then the EU should consider this seat to be safe as well and allow the import of that seat; and vice versa. How likely is that? Related post in the Atlantic Review: European Union Directive: American exporters must only use the metric system after January 1, 2010. Endnote: The United States Mission to Germany has created a website about shared EU-US trade interests, the latest US trade policy developments and the US position on the trade disputes with the EU. (The embassy also chronicles the latest developments in US-German relations.) (Photo source: White House)
UPDATE: Daniel W. Drezner, blog• • Jagdish Bhagwati, "Technology, not Globalisation, Drives Wages Down," Financial Times, January 3, 2007 •
|
[Source: Atlantic Review - Analysis of Transatlantic Relations and U.S. Foreign Policy] quoted: Christoph von Marschall explains in Der Tagesspiegel (in German) that Merkel is not proposing an ambitious Transatlantic Free Trade Area (TAFTA), but common technical standards and patent laws so that European and American companies do not need to please two bureaucracies. This is expected to increase trade. Comments ()
Tracked: Jan 15, 06:57