In my humble opinion: The jokes by US comedians are quite different from the ones that you mention.

Besides, it makes a difference if someone makes fun of his own country rather than somebody else's country. At least it feels different. Similarly with Anti-Americanism: If a German says xyz about the US, then it is often considered Anti-Americanism. If an American says the same, then it is not considered Anti-Americanism.
Anyway: I am NOT calling those jokes Anti-German. I just point out that US comedians still use Nazi jokes to comment on German foreign policy.

I do NOT feel offended by any of these jokes. I just find them lame.
It's time to write some new jokes about Germany. I find it unfortunate that quite a few Americans associate Germany first with the Nazis.

I am not so sensitive as you suggest, but it was my mistake. I should have used a different word than "sensitive" in the post. What I meant was what Boyes wrote: "No other society so regularly seeks the views of foreigners. How are we doing, Dutch or Italian or indeed British correspondents are asked on television. Are we messing up again; are we failing Europe; are we incapable of change?"
Besides, we can agree to disagree about how much Germans care about the opinions of allied nations. I just want to point out that doing our share and responsibility etc (Bündnistreue, Verantwortung gerecht werden) are part of any discussion. Perhaps not that serious, but it is discussed.

Re pacifism: There is a significant minority in Germany which opposes every war and believes that a war is never justified. You mentioned the demonstrations in the 80s. There were large demonstrations against the first Gulf war (1991) as well and smaller (but still considerable demonstrations) against the Iraq war in 2003.

And then there is this poll: 62% of Germans think that a war is never justified.
68% of polled Germans believe that any conflict can be solved by peaceful means.
The majority of those polled in Poland, Netherlands, UK, and USA, believe that wars are justified under certain circumstances.
"Die soeben veröffentlichte Studie wurde vom Sozialwissenschaftlichen Institut der Bundeswehr erstellt. Sie beruht auf einer repräsentativen Befragung von 2544 Personen im Alter über 16 Jahren, die in Privathaushalten in Deutschland leben. (...)
Im Unterschied zu vielen anderen Ländern nannten die Befürworter eines internationalen Engagemenents altruistische Gründe für ihre Haltung. 40 Prozent von ihnen waren der Meinung, daß ein politisch so bedeutendes und wirtschaftlich so starkes Land wie Deutschland eine entsprechende Verantwortung bei der Bewältigung von Krisen und Konflikten zu tragen habe. Etwa ein Drittel führte persönliche Betroffenheit und moralische Verpflichtung an. Verbreitet war auch die Auffassung, daß Deutschland sich nicht isolieren dürfe und seine Verpflichtungen als Mitglied von EU, Nato und UN zu erfüllen habe. Die Wahrung ökonomischer und politischer Interessen, die in der klassischen Lehre als Maßstab für die Außenpolitik eines Landes gilt, wurde dagegen nur von wenigen für wichtig gehalten.
Diese stark von pazifistischen oder idealistischen Zügen geprägte Weltsicht findet sich in der Einstellung zu militärischer Macht und Gewalt wieder. Auf die Frage, ob unter bestimmten Umständen Krieg notwendig sei, um Gerechtigkeit zu erlangen, antworteten 62 Prozent mit Nein. 68 Prozent waren der Meinung, daß sich Konflikte in einem Staat oder zwischen Staaten immer mit friedlichen Mitteln lösen lassen. (...)
Bulmahn weist darauf hin, daß es gerade die Einstellung zur Legitimität militärischer Gewalt ist, in der sich die Deutschen von anderen westlichen Staaten unterscheiden. In Polen seien 53 Prozent der Auffassung, Krieg sei unter Umständen nötig, um Gerechtigkeit zu erlangen. Noch höher liegen diese Werte in den Niederlanden (60), in Großbritannien (79) und den Vereinigten Staaten (89). Anscheinend wirkt die historische Erfahrung der beiden Weltkriege in Deutschland noch stark nach."

Source: Pazifistische Züge
Eine Studie über das außenpolitische Denken der Deutschen/Von Nikolas Busse

Text: F.A.Z., 13.03.2006, Nr. 61 / Seite 10
http://islamfaz.de/13.3.06Archiv.htm

Also in German:
http://wasteland.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=170

Zyme, what do you make of this poll?
Why do you think is pacifism more widespread in Germany than in other countries?
To be sure: I am not saying that the majority of Germans are really pacifist. I think it is a minority, but a significant minority.

In addition, there is a pacifist sentiment among others. Therefore it is difficult for any German government to send troops into war.
Though, there are also many good additional reasons to be very reluctant about sending troops into war.

I guess, I expected different humor, because of the strong preference for political correctness and the little tolerance regarding ethnic slurs on US television.
I thought, there is always an outcry in the US whenever someone makes fun of Asian Americans or African Americans or the Mexicans, Japanese and Poles etc. I thought, that for some weird reason, Americans were only "allowed" to make silly and bigotted jokes about the French.

The British press performed a remarkable U-turn during this year's World Cup. They wrote positive reports about the Germans.
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/luke_harding/2006/12/post_839.html

"Everybody knows, US-citizens are not prone to balance. Any comment or remark on non-us-stuff from the us-side that is constructive is great and extraordinary, any other stuff just normal, to be expected."

I am not sure I understand your comment on US-citizens. Are you blaming Americans for not being balanced or the American media for not informing Americans, i.e. for not giving them sufficient information to make up their mind in a balanced way? (Or are both the same?)
I think there is a lack of international news and commentary in many US newspapers (primarily local and regional papers), and the TV evening news programs etc. International news and opinions are covered, whenever someone opposes US policy or makes an Anti-American comment; in addition to that, there does not seem to be that much. So I agree with you in this regard.
Americans, however, seem to be very interested and balanced. When Americans meet a foreigner they ask all kinds of questions and want to know more etc.
And many Americans use the internet to get international news these days...

"If you just trried to counter stuff like the one on this horrible medienkritik site, I sink sis here was not stupid enough. You'd haf to try harder to get down on this level."

Won't do that.
I just think political comedians are pretty powerful. They make comments on the news. Such broadcasted stereotypes are pretty powerful.

Harald Schmidt and Stefan Raab used to make silly and bigotted jokes about Poles stealing our cars. They don't do that anymore, do they?
I don't find these jokes funny either. Like the Nazi jokes, these are silly and lame. My opposition to these jokes is NOT based on being überempfindlich and being politically correct. I just think they are old, childish and not funny. I think Loriot and others great comedians would agree.

Anyway, I just my two cents.