|
< Previous Post | Next Post >
Friday, October 27. 2006Leading Role for NATO in Germany's New Security and Defense Policy ReviewPosted by Joerg Wolf in German Politics, Transatlantic Relations on Friday, October 27. 2006
UPDATE: Marco Overhaus, a research fellow at the University of Trier and Fulbright Alumnus, describes Germany's new White Paper on security policy as a "Solid Basis for a Needed Debate.":
The White Paper devotes considerable space to describing the comparative advantages of both NATO (with its integrated military structure) and the European Union (with its broad array of foreign and security instruments) and quite frankly states that the current state of cooperation between both organizations is unsatisfactory. Certainly, a distinct feature of the present White Paper is its clear and unequivocal commitment to NATO as "the cornerstone of German security and defence policy." This is probably the clearest departure of German security policy under the previous government of Chancellor Schroeder who was willing to confront Washington and put more emphasis on the development of the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP). (...)Overhaus also criticizes that the White Paper "shies away from honestly addressing the problems of German and international efforts to deal with the decreasing stability" in Afghanistan. His general assessment, however, tilts towards the positive. He concludes that "the White Paper should also be understood as a starting point for a national debate on security policy which is urgently needed as increasing international demands on Germany meet more scepticism on the domestic front." The Financial Times comments on the White Paper as well and argues that Germany"needs to get rid of conscription, a tradition that limits the country's military effectiveness." That won't happen anytime soon. [END of UPDATE] The New York Times writes about the new German Defense White Book: Germany will publish a defense and security policy review on Wednesday [October 25, 2006] that says the country is poised to play a major role in Europe without distancing itself from the NATO alliance. The review -- the first in 12 years -- is a sign that Germany has grown more confident and assertive about its place on the international stage, after decades spent living down the aggression and atrocities of the Nazi years and then knitting itself back into a single nation. (...) As a member of NATO, the review says, Germany's obligation to defend its allies in case of attack extends to giving "assistance in crises and conflicts that could escalate into concrete threats." That language reflects Germany's decision to start allowing Bundeswehr troops to deploy outside NATO territory as part of international peacekeeping missions. (...) Critics who have seen it say it fails to define under what circumstances the Bundeswehr would intervene outside Germany. Nor does it spell out Germany's view of the role of NATO and the European Union in dealing with new threats, particularly international terrorism. Both organizations have rapid reaction forces that are supposed to be ready to reach trouble spots anywhere in the world within a few days. And both are competing for financing from their members to buy new military equipment and pay for military missions. (...) The review carefully avoids pitting the needs and goals of the European Union and NATO against one another. "Both have indispensable contributions for our security," the document says. Germany "will work toward improving the relationship between both organizations in a way that leads to closer cooperation, greater efficiency, avoids duplication and strengthens the European and transatlantic relationship overall." But it states that the "fundamental questions of Europe's security can only in the future be answered together with the United States."International Herald Tribune: The document says that "North Atlantic relations remain the basis of German and European common security," says German-American ties require "constant care and deepening through mutual consultation and agreed action" and stresses that the European Union and NATO are "not in competition."Ulrich Speck has already read the 133 pages and learned that NATO continues to be the prefered international organisation for Germany, followed by the EU and the UN. His Kosmoblog (in German) and many others observers criticize the lack of precise statements and prioritization. You can read the full "White Paper 2006 on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr" in German at Weissbuch.de or download a 7 pages long English summary (pdf). Related posts in the Atlantic Review: • "The Evolution of Resurging German Power" • Defense budget: US spends too much and Europe spends too little? • EU plans to increase joint defense spending and to secure elections in Congo
Comments (38)
Defined tags for this entry: Defense, European Union, Fulbrighter, Germany, Military, NATO, Strategy
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
Don S
- #1 - 2006-10-26 02:11 - (Reply)
"North Atlantic relations remain the basis of German and European common security" Comments ()
Zyme
- #2 - 2006-10-26 11:07 - (Reply)
Don S is right about options: If the White Book contained a clear preference for the Nato OR EU-Corps, our country would have lost lots of influence in the non-preferred alliance. Comments ()
Don S
- #2.1 - 2006-10-26 18:25 - (Reply)
I was being sarcastic, Zyme. Comments ()
Martin
- #2.1.1 - 2006-10-26 21:13 - (Reply)
Bismarck and Talleyrand would do the same. Comments ()
Don
- #2.1.1.1 - 2006-10-26 21:33 - (Reply)
How was fighting the Kosovo War for Europe in US interests, pray tell? Comments ()
Martin
- #2.1.1.1.1 - 2006-10-27 01:40 - (Reply)
Likewise you could ask what is Europe doing in Afghanistan? Vacation spot or solidarity with the United States or self-interest? Comments ()
Martin
- #2.1.1.1.1.1 - 2006-10-27 01:46 - (Reply)
Not a single American soldier was killed in Bosnia and Kosovo. Comments ()
Don
- #2.1.1.1.1.1.1 - 2006-10-27 03:41 - (Reply)
"Not a single American soldier was killed in Bosnia and Kosovo." Comments ()
Don
- #2.1.1.1.1.2 - 2006-10-27 03:51 - (Reply)
"Likewise you could ask what is Europe doing in Afghanistan? Vacation spot or solidarity with the United States or self-interest?" Comments ()
Olaf Petersen
- #3 - 2006-10-26 11:52 - (Reply)
In case of Iraq Germany was right 'to opt out' - Operation Iraqi Freedom was clearly against international law and the UN-Charta. All relevant resolutions including the notorious 1441 were based on the cease-fire resolution 687. The only nation in the world that had the right to announce the end of the 1991 cease-fire with Iraq was Kuwait, but that never happened.- Comments ()
Don S
- #3.1 - 2006-10-26 17:11 - (Reply)
"Operation Iraqi Freedom was clearly against international law and the UN-Charta" Comments ()
Ulrich Speck
- #4 - 2006-10-26 12:59 - (Reply)
The fundamental problem with the Weißbuch is that it doesn't defines priorities. Comments ()
Don S
- #5 - 2006-10-26 21:54 - (Reply)
Gentlemen, the US indeed fought the Kosovo war for US interests as we percieved themn at the time. Call it the 'Three Musketeers' rationale. 'All for one and One for All. Comments ()
Anonymous
- #6 - 2006-10-27 00:23 - (Reply)
Don S Comments ()
ADMIN
- #7 - 2006-10-27 09:58 - (Reply)
The post has been updated to include a commentary, which describes the White Paper as a basis for a much needed national debate about Germany's interests, criteria for international Bundeswehr missions, security policy in general etc. Comments ()
Zyme
- #8 - 2006-10-27 12:06 - (Reply)
"Hopefully that debate will take place and a new and more precise White Paper will emerge soon." Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #8.1 - 2006-10-27 13:09 - (Reply)
I have been imprecise. By "hopefully" I meant that this is what I hope will happen. It should happen, it must happen. It is not very likely, but it is not just wishful thinking either. Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #8.1.1 - 2006-10-27 13:13 - (Reply)
The Wikipedia article about the Quadrennial Defense Review is just one sentence long: Comments ()
Fuchur
- #9 - 2006-10-27 13:53 - (Reply)
Thanks for (as usual), compiling a load of interesting links! Comments ()
Zyme
- #10 - 2006-10-27 15:36 - (Reply)
"What does that have to do with it? Comments ()
Don S
- #11 - 2006-10-27 17:13 - (Reply)
"The White Paper is the German equivalent to the Quadrennial Defense Review" Comments ()
Fuchur
- #11.1 - 2006-10-27 18:37 - (Reply)
"and not assume that the US will be there to do the fighting in European crisises any more" Comments ()
Don S
- #11.1.1 - 2006-10-27 21:11 - (Reply)
Spain, Fuchur. Don't forget Spain's unique contribution.... Comments ()
Fuchur
- #11.1.1.1 - 2006-10-28 01:57 - (Reply)
What´s your point?! Comments ()
Don S
- #11.1.1.1.1 - 2006-10-29 22:01 - (Reply)
Fuchur, words cannot express the profound depths of my ingratitude toward most of these noble countries - with one exception, the UK. Comments ()
David
- #11.1.1.1.2 - 2006-10-30 02:32 - (Reply)
These are the names of Spanish troops killed in Bush's Iraq debacle. Comments ()
Fuchur
- #11.1.1.1.2.1 - 2006-10-30 16:39 - (Reply)
Yes, that´s their names. But I guess one has to do a lot more than to just give one's live in order to earn oneself the gratitude of people like DonS... Comments ()
Don S
- #11.1.1.1.2.1.1 - 2006-10-30 18:00 - (Reply)
Gratitude goes to the individual, Fuchur. Not to a nation or a continent, particularly a nation or a continent which has behaved the way Zapatero did. And Schroeder and Chirac behaved as well.... Comments ()
Ulrich Speck
- #12 - 2006-10-28 18:47 - (Reply)
Fuchur brings it to the point:"If you write 149 pages, with the result that the whole nation wonders what you´re actually saying - then you did a really crappy job!" Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #12.1 - 2006-10-28 19:34 - (Reply)
I disagree with your understanding of strategy. I think a good strategy never excludes any options. Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #13 - 2006-10-30 10:07 - (Reply)
Bertelsmann Foundation has written a short (15 pages), superficial, not really interesting paper about the Weissbuch titled "Gut, aber nicht gut genug". The consider the Weissbuch a success all in all: Comments ()
Fuchur
- #14.1 - 2006-10-31 22:02 - (Reply)
Dunno - guess it depends upon which Americans you feel thankful to. Comments ()
Anonymous
- #14.2 - 2006-11-01 20:01 - (Reply)
@ Joe Comments ()
joe
- #15 - 2006-11-01 18:49 - (Reply)
fucher Comments ()
joe
- #16 - 2006-11-02 21:29 - (Reply)
Anno Comments ()
Anonymous
- #16.1 - 2006-11-03 10:48 - (Reply)
[i]"Neither the German government nor the German people ever thanked the thousands of US service member’s families whose sons died while training in Germany to protect Germans prior to the fall of the Berlin Wall."[/i] Comments ()
joe
- #17 - 2006-11-07 04:03 - (Reply)
Ammo, Comments ()
|
Contact UsEmail Joerg Wolf and Kyle Atwell at:
ar-team AT atlanticreview.org We are available for interviews, and appreciate feedback and suggestions. Subscribe and FollowWelcome!
You are reading the ATLANTIC REVIEW, a Press Digest on Transatlantic Relations combined with commentary and analysis. More about us. Follow Atlantic Review on Facebook or on Twitter. Subscribe to one of our RSS-Feeds or to our newsletter. SponsorSUPPORT THIS SITEBlogrollHot TopicsClick on one of the following links to see all Atlantic Review posts about this topic in a chronological order with the latest post on top:
Afghanistan Anti-Americanism Economics Iran Iraq Merkel Polls Terrorism Click here for the full list of all topics. |
Home - About Us - Newsletter - Transatlantic Relations - US Foreign Policy - Various RSS Feeds Designed for Atlantic Review by Carl.


The Atlantic Review has already written about German Reactions to the Midterm Elections. Americans are now commenting about the European reactions to the elections: "Aspen Institute Berlin Director Jeffrey Gedmin has an interesting and useful piece, Comments ()
Tracked: Nov 16, 12:02
"Kurt Beck, leader of the Social Democrats, called Monday [November 6th] for a European army with a single command, the first time a German political party has proposed such a structure. If adopted, it could lead to the European Union pursuing a secu Comments ()
Tracked: Nov 20, 10:06