|
< Previous Post | Next Post >
Friday, September 29. 2006Europe Loses Afghanistan and America Looks at Nice PicturesPosted by Joerg Wolf in Transatlantic Relations, US Foreign Policy on Friday, September 29. 2006
"The American ambassador to Kabul has accused European members of Nato of jeopardising the future of the alliance by refusing to send troops to Afghanistan, or banning their forces from entering areas with heavy fighting." writes the British Telegraph:
Ronald Neumann, who has survived two attempts on his life this year, said European nations must not turn "coward" and "run away" from fighting terrorism in Afghanistan. In an interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel, Mr Neumann said some Europeans "obviously resist the idea that you haveClearly, more troops are urgently needed. Even compared to Iraq, there are too few troops in Afghanistan. The situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated and all three international editions of Newsweek's latest issue have "Losing Afghanistan" on the cover. "The Rise of Jihadistan" is the cover story: "Five years after the Afghan invasion, the Taliban are fighting back hard, carving out a sanctuary where they -- and Al Qaeda's leaders -- can operate freely." The U.S. edition, however, has a cover story about Annie Leibovitz's Amazing 'Life in Pictures'. This is not the first time for Newsweek: See the Atlantic Review post: "Dream on America". President Bush is often asked why he does not send more troops to Iraq (Afghanistan does not seem to be that much of an issue compared to Iraq). He often replies that he would send more troops, if the military commanders would request them. Well, U.S. generals request more troops for Afghanistan, but it seems primarily the Europeans get blamed for not sending additional troops. More about NATO's Increasing Involvement in Afghanistan, NATO's Difficulties to Get More Troops for Afghanistan, and A Global NATO for more Burden Sharing?
Comments (18)
Defined tags for this entry: Afghanistan, Alliance, Defense, Media, Military, NATO, Solidarity, Steinmeier, Terrorism
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
alec
- #1 - 2006-09-29 16:24 - (Reply)
This is one issue I feel fairly combative about towards the Germans and French. 3000 Germans in Afghanistan and how many French? Less than that I believe. And for the first 4 years of combat, both nations pretty much refused to help in southern Afghanistan, the most combat prone area. While I am glad to see NATO involved in southern Afghanistan currently, I am displeased that Afghanistan has been America and Great Britain's project for the most part. Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #1.1 - 2006-09-29 18:56 - (Reply)
Alec, I agree with most of what you say. That's why I wrote a lot recently on Afghanistan and the lack of troops from Europe. However, I think America contributes 60% of the foreign troops in Afghanistan and European and other allies contribute 40%. That sounds pretty fair to me. (Well, there is a difference in capabilities, of course.) Comments ()
Don
- #1.1.1 - 2006-09-29 20:10 - (Reply)
" I think America contributes 60% of the foreign troops in Afghanistan and European and other allies contribute 40%. That sounds pretty fair to me." Comments ()
Don
- #1.2 - 2006-09-29 19:16 - (Reply)
The international system since the fall of the Berlin Wall has come to resemble a game of 'buck-buck', which was an invention of comedian Bill Cosby. One small group of players line up anchored by a light pole and another very large team of players jumps on their backs one by one unt8il they break. Comments ()
Fullie
- #2 - 2006-09-29 18:34 - (Reply)
Atlantic Review does not even feel any obligation to have a blog on the Senate vote yesterday. 65 out of 100 senators voted to ALLOW TORTURING prisoners of war. A clear denial of the Geneva convention. Comments ()
clarence
- #2.1 - 2006-09-29 20:19 - (Reply)
>65 out of 100 senators Comments ()
Torture
- #2.1.1 - 2006-10-02 23:40 - (Reply)
Column: Some things are hard to forget Comments ()
Anonymous
- #2.2 - 2006-09-30 00:02 - (Reply)
WASHINGTON, DC—Led by a bipartisan group of senators critical of White House policy on suspected terrorists, the Senate passed a bill Thursday that prohibits interrogators from exceeding 100 amps per testicle when questioning detainees. "Even in times of war, it counterproductive and wrong to employ certain inhumane interrogation techniques, and using three-digit amperage levels on the testicles of captives constitutes torture... Comments ()
Don
- #2.2.1 - 2006-09-30 02:26 - (Reply)
Sounds good to me. Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #3 - 2006-09-29 20:05 - (Reply)
I have just cross-posted my article at European Tribune. Check out the comments over there. They are much different from the discussions at Atlantic Review... Comments ()
alec
- #3.1 - 2006-09-29 20:09 - (Reply)
Ugh, I don't have the desire to get into that discussion. My basic reaction is you don't have to equate George Bush with Afghanistan. At all. We would have been in this if Gore was President as well. Comments ()
Thomas
- #4 - 2006-09-29 22:27 - (Reply)
Why isn't NATO burning the poppy fields? Comments ()
fredouil
- #5 - 2006-09-30 06:35 - (Reply)
it s look like Fulbright means brainwashed too. Comments ()
fredouil
- #5.1 - 2006-09-30 12:56 - (Reply)
BTW i start to understand why your are quite warmonger, your scholarship has been paid by weaponry : Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #5.1.1 - 2006-09-30 13:48 - (Reply)
You are very funny! Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #6 - 2006-09-30 08:44 - (Reply)
One more reason why Europe should do more in Afghanistan: Comments ()
Don
- #7 - 2006-10-05 01:09 - (Reply)
Looking at one of Joerg's previous posts I see that Germany is contributing 2651 toorps, Italy 1464, France 932, and Spain 612 trrops in Afghanistan. The US has at least 22,000 troops in Afghanistan and the British about 5500. Comments ()
|
Contact UsEmail Joerg Wolf and Kyle Atwell at:
ar-team AT atlanticreview.org We are available for interviews, and appreciate feedback and suggestions. Subscribe and FollowWelcome!
You are reading the ATLANTIC REVIEW, a Press Digest on Transatlantic Relations combined with commentary and analysis. More about us. Follow Atlantic Review on Facebook or on Twitter. Subscribe to one of our RSS-Feeds or to our newsletter. SponsorSUPPORT THIS SITEBlogrollHot TopicsClick on one of the following links to see all Atlantic Review posts about this topic in a chronological order with the latest post on top:
Afghanistan Anti-Americanism Economics Iran Iraq Merkel Polls Terrorism Click here for the full list of all topics. |
Home - About Us - Newsletter - Transatlantic Relations - US Foreign Policy - Various RSS Feeds Designed for Atlantic Review by Carl.


• Polls: The public diplomacy blog Eccentric Star quotes an AP report about Iraqi views of their country's future, including this: About six in 10 Iraqis say they approve of attacks on U.S.-led forces, and slightly more than that want their governmen Comments ()
Tracked: Oct 08, 14:08
While "the Bush administration has complained about the tenor of media coverage of the war in Iraq ever since the April 2003 looting that followed the fall of Baghdad," negative stories in the U.S. media have only "outweighed positive ones Comments ()
Tracked: Oct 30, 18:23