|
< Previous Post | Next Post >
Sunday, September 10. 2006German 9/11 Victim Defamed in "United 93" MoviePosted by Joerg Wolf in Fulbright, Transatlantic Relations, US Domestic and Cultural Issues on Sunday, September 10. 2006
The movie "United 93" shows how American heroes take on the hijackers -- but only after a German passenger has tried to persuade them not to. The movie is described as "meticulously researched" and "fact-based", but there is not any indication that Christian Adams, deputy directory of the German Wine Institute and a Fulbright Alumnus, acted in the cowardly appeasing way he is portrayed in the movie.
Anthony Kaufman writes in his review in AlterNet: "a German blond businessman who turns out as a stereotypically weak-kneed Euro-pacifist (an obvious non-American who is eventually neutralized)." The Film Fatale blog writes in "United 93's Euro-Pacifist Passenger": ![]() To set up the non-American passenger as a phony obstacle to their heroism-is insulting. Even the four hijackers got a more humane portrayal.John Harris writes for the Guardian's website: "The film United 93 finds old Europe literally standing in the way of US derring-do. The only trouble is, it didn't happen that way." Cosmo Landesman writes in The Times: There is the awkward question of the much-celebrated bravery of the passengers. Were all of them heroic, or just the half-dozen we see charging the terrorists? It’s interesting that the most vocal passenger to advocate a policy of do-nothing is not an American but a German. Greengrass and his actors meticulously researched and created all the scenarios, but how did they establish that he was the leading advocate of appeasement? Surely one of the passengers didn’t phone home to point out there was a cowardly German on board who wanted to give in? The film doesn't want to deal with the possibility that there were Americans who opted to stay silent and seated. Greengrass wants it both ways: he wants to pose both as the objective documentarist who just presents the facts as they unfolded, and as the dramatist who presents an upbeat portrait of American bravery that makes everybody look good. PORTRAYING FICTION AS FACTS: Indeed, the director's statement on the movie's official website starts with: United 93 is a film about 9/11. It tells the story of the day through a meticulous re-enactment of events surrounding United 93, the last of four hijacked aircraft, in the belief that by examining this single event something much larger can be found - the shape of our world today.This shape of our world apparently includes cowardly Germans. The statement claims: Made with the full support of the families of those on board, United 93 will track in real time the dramatic story of what happened inside the aircraft as well as on the ground.However, the family of Christian Adams was not interviewed. The actor who played Christian Adams told the BBC that his widow did not want to co-operate with film-makers because it was too painful. The Sonntagsblatt Bayern confirms this and adds that according to the audiofiles one passenger said that he did not want to die, but in the movie those words were used in German and attributed to Christian Adams Nicht alle Familien haben dabei mitgemacht. Die Familie des deutschen Todesopfers Christian Adams wollte dem Film zwar keine Steine in den Weg legen, hat sich darüber hinaus aber bewusst nicht beteiligt. Der damals 37-jährige Wein- und Marketing-Fachmann Adams aus Biebelsheim war auf dem Weg nach Kalifornien, um dort auf einer Messe deutsche Weine zu präsentieren.The BBC writes that the actor defends his portrayal of Christian Adams by saying that he read that Christian "never made rash decisions and everything he did was always well-considered." However, as the Post Gazette wrote in 2001: "One of the most impressive things about Christian was his willingness to dive in and do whatever needed to be done," said Carol Sullivan, director of the German Wine Information Bureau in New York. "No job was ever beneath him."Christian Adams was also one of two Fulbrighters killed on September 11, 2001. David Rice died in the World Trade Center and had been an American Fulbright graduate student in Zimbabwe, remarked Marianne Craven on behalf of the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the Department of State. The Renaissance Monkey is angry: The family and friends of Christian Adams, who have all already suffered more than anyone should ever have to, now face the besmirching of their lost loved one's memory and quite possibly the public accusation of cowardice from the ignorant who will believe that "United 93" is in some way an accurate depiction of what occurred. I was feeling uncomfortable with these September 11th film projects, but now, certainly in the case of Mr Greengrass' fantasy, I feel nothing but utter revulsion. WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL? "United 93" is not a normal movie that just happens to make a German look bad. It is a) about a real event and b) about real people who were killed. c) described as fact-based, well-researched docudrama that honors the victims and inspires Americans. Despite all this, America's leading film critics praised "United 93." The movie has an average rating of 8.1 out of 10 ten points, which makes it the "cream of the crop", according to the movie rating service Rotten Tomatoes. It seems most (or all?) of the movie reviews published in U.S. papers were not at all concerned about the portrayal of Christian Adams. On the contrary: The leading film critic Roger Ebert ignores the German victim and calls it "a masterful and heartbreaking film, and it does honor to the memory of the victims." Quotes from a random sample of other reviews: • The Philadelphia Weekly opines: You're not going to find a movie from a major studio with more integrity than United 93. Made with support of the victims' families, and hewing as close as possible to facts confirmed by the 9/11 commission report, the film isn't a cash-in. There's not an exploitative frame in the picture. It's also not an editorial, and it's most certainly not a Hollywood thriller. (…) At no point during United 93 does it feel like you're watching a movie. It feels like you're there.• The NY Times reviewer Manohla Dargis consider the movie: A persuasively narrated, scrupulously tasteful re-creation of the downing of the fourth and final plane hijacked by Islamist terrorists on Sept. 11. (…) Drawing on different sources, including the report and family members, Mr. Greengrass follows the same trajectory as the report, with most of the screen time devoted to the period between takeoff and the excruciating moments before the plane crashed. The film carries the standard caution that it is "a creative work based on fact," yet Mr. Greengrass's use of nonfiction tropes, like the jagged camerawork and the rushed, overlapping shards of naturalistic dialogue, invests his storytelling with a visceral, combat-zone verisimilitude. And yet at the same time, beat for beat, the whole thing plays out very much according to the Hollywood playbook. (…) Mr. Greengrass has worked hard to honor the victims, as has the studio releasing the film.• The Seattle Post Intelligencer's movie critic William Arnold describes the movie under the headline "Grippingly realistic 'United 93' takes you to the fateful skies of 9/11 -- almost": Universal's "United 93," is a respectful, accomplished, non-exploitative piece of historical filmmaking and -- for audiences -- a gripping white-knuckle ride all the way. (…) "United 93" is not a film with a political agenda --it strains to be a sober, somber, straightforward re-creation of the event --…" Many conservative Americans were outraged by alleged inaccuracies and by the unfair portrayal of the Bush administration in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11. and criticized that many Germans liked the movie so much. Right now many liberal Americans are outraged by the ABC docudrama The Path to 9/11 and protest against alleged inaccuracies in the portion of the film concerned with the Clinton administration in the 1990s. However apparently hardly anybody in the American mainstream media and only very few bloggers are troubled by the inaccuracies or the portrayal of Christian Adams in United 93. Germans don't make a fuss either. There were not any protests against the movie in Germany and we do not need any in my humble opinion. The British media seems to be more critical of the movie than the German media. While an increasing number of American bloggers and their readers complain about Anti-Americanism in Germany, Germans don't make an issue of "Anti-Germanism". In fact, there is not even such a term as "Anti-Germanism." "United 93" has been shown in German cinemas for weeks. The DVD will be released in Germany in December, but can be imported from the UK in October. In the United States the DVD is already available: ANY EXCUSES? John Harris criticizes on the Guardian's website the movie and the attempts of the director to defend the portrayal of Christian Adams in a BBC interview: A European-accented passenger pointedly makes the case for negotiation - and then, come the storming of the flight deck, attempts to place himself in the way. Given the patriotic legend of flight 93 ("Let's roll," said one passenger, unwittingly launching a tub-thumping Neil Young record, several thousand T-shirts and a catchphrase that crystallised a very American derring-do), this little subplot packs a very hard punch: when the film plays in the US, there will surely be all kinds of cries about old European surrender monkeys, the US's contrasting backbone etc. So, from where did this episode come? As it turns out, nowhere. We know there was a German passenger - one Christian Adams, aged 37 - on board, but that's it. His role in the movie is the product of something several light years away from artistic license, as is proved by the exchange between Greengrass and Kirsty Wark on Thursday's Newsnight:Actually, he was 13 rather than eight years old in 1977, but still that's not a good excuse. MORE CRITICISM FROM BLOGGERS: • Anglofritz opines: "In the film, the German is a cowardly snake." • Island Monkey writes in the post "United 93 German Stereotype Included": Unfortunately for me there are also key inaccuracies, and one of them is absolutely unforgiveable involving a rather shallow portrayal of a German passenger, and, ultimately, this ensured it was a disappointing film. In fact, I could not believe what I was watching. During the scenes when the passengers are planning to revolt against the terrorists a heavily stereotypical German man repeatedly tries to prevent them and especially at the key moment when they rush the terrorists. The film is absolutely gripping at this point. But this German man/actor stands up to warn the terrorists of the attack by the passengers. What? It destroyed the film for me for a number of reasons. For one - it is completely inaccurate and even the director has admitted this. It's farcical really. But the problem is also that back in the real world there was a sole German man on board that plane. • Andrew Lang from Ohio, who blogs at Blue in a Red State, has sent this email a few weeks ago: I'm probably going to write a blog before the deadline on the shameful portrayal of a German citizen, Christian Adams, in the film "United 93". He was one of the passengers killed on the flight. The director decided to assign him the role of the one coward among the passengers: first he argues to appease the hijackers by doing nothing, then he panics and attempts to warn the hijackers that the passengers are planning to storm the cabin and seize control of the plane. The actor (also a German, so the intent here is unmistakable) appears at first agitated and disagreeable, then completely out of control.• Anthony Kaufman writes in his blog about the "Surrender Monkey": In my review of "United 93" awhile back, I pointed out the strange presence of "a German blond businessman who turns out as a stereotypically weak-kneed Euro-pacifist (an obvious non-American who is eventually neutralized)." The character stands in a stark contrast to the "American heroes" who fight back -- and his stereotypical attitude is finally getting noticed in Europe. (...) It's further evidence of how much the movie panders to American cowboy politics -- and reaffirms both American and E.U. stereotypes. Welcome Reddit readers. Please, have a look around the site for other posts concerning transatlantic relations. Here are our must reads. And these are our latest posts: • Germany's Fast Aid after Katrina and "Role Reversal" • What Europeans and Americans Agree and Disagree on • About Terrorism and Security Policy Debates in Germany and the United States
Comments (72)
Defined tags for this entry: Art, Cultural Diplomacy, Fulbright, Fulbrighter, Germany, Media, Moral Values, Terrorism
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
zebul666
- #1 - 2006-09-10 10:10 - (Reply)
since the War on Irak, look at the films made in the U.S. The french men are now always the bad and perfidious guys and a traitor. Comments ()
DudeAsInCool
- #2 - 2006-09-10 10:49 - (Reply)
Any suggestion that the filmmakers set out ot defame anyone European, or in particular as specific German man, is ridiculous. They tried to make as accurate a presentation as they could. See the movie before making outlandish claims - I saw it and walked out of the theater with sympathy for all the passengers Comments ()
Kingchiron
- #2.1 - 2006-09-10 22:13 - (Reply)
You say "They tried to make as accurate a presentation as they could." Ok, so then where did the portrayal of this real man as a coward come from? If there's no evidence that he acted in this way then your statement isn't accurate. Comments ()
Anonymous
- #3 - 2006-09-10 11:47 - (Reply)
To explain the lack of criticism in Germany: Maybe nobody cared to watch a movie without hollywood stars, or the German version was changed or the German passenger was not recognized as German because the movie was synchonized into German. Comments ()
Coward german
- #3.1 - 2006-09-15 09:56 - (Reply)
Hello everybody, Comments ()
Fuchur
- #4 - 2006-09-10 12:06 - (Reply)
It´s understandable that the movie makers wanted an "appeaser" in their storyline. I mean, in every movie of that kind, there is this character who starts to panic and refuses to go on. And IMO, it´s quite reasonable to assume that some passengers were against storming the cockpit (although probably not in such an extreme way as portrayed in the movie). Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #4.1 - 2006-09-10 12:14 - (Reply)
Great comments and a good question, Fuchur! Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #5 - 2006-09-10 12:19 - (Reply)
In May and in June President Bush said that for non-Americans September 11th was just "a moment", which I consider unfair, a bit offensive and totally inaccurate. Just two of the many reasons: Comments ()
Possum - At the Zoo
- #5.1 - 2006-09-12 01:23 - (Reply)
What’s unfair about that? You might as well accuse the statement of being purple. Calling it unfair makes no sense. Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #5.1.1 - 2006-09-12 01:37 - (Reply)
Oh Possum, Comments ()
Possum
- #5.1.1.1 - 2006-09-15 02:48 - (Reply)
Read this about NATO, especially Germany, in Afghanistan for instance: Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #5.1.1.1.1 - 2006-09-15 14:38 - (Reply)
Thank you for the links. Very much appreciated. Comments ()
Possum
- #5.2 - 2006-09-12 01:37 - (Reply)
Woops -- cut-and-paste error. Continued ... Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #5.2.1 - 2006-09-12 01:44 - (Reply)
a) You are not well-informed. Comments ()
Don
- #5.2.1.1 - 2006-09-12 02:16 - (Reply)
Joerg, I think the point being made is that the lack of contribution and foot-dragging on the grudging efforts which have been made have 'killed' NATO. Comments ()
Olaf Petersen
- #6 - 2006-09-10 15:33 - (Reply)
Tasteless, a scandal. Even if the German victim was afraid to die, even if he wasn't a hero: Comments ()
Don
- #6.1 - 2006-09-10 17:27 - (Reply)
"Americans seem to enjoy making foreign victims of 9/11 the target of blatant disrespect and resentment. They...- I better stop now." Comments ()
VinceTN
- #7 - 2006-09-10 16:34 - (Reply)
Looking at the politics of the web sites you linked to shows people who likely resent any movie showing brave Americans defeating pure evil. Its not nuanced enough and shows fighting as a viable alternative to appeasement. We don't want those stupid Americans to get confused and think they can actually fight this thing, do we? Comments ()
Thomas
- #7.1 - 2006-09-11 08:46 - (Reply)
This is not abstract and general, but concrete. Comments ()
jh99
- #8 - 2006-09-10 18:02 - (Reply)
i can easily see why noone in germany was enraged, most movies in german are dubbed. so unless christian adams is made out to a german by something other then speaking german in an english film (which he doesnt in the dubbed version) one wouldnt even notice... Comments ()
eccentric recluse
- #9 - 2006-09-10 20:30 - (Reply)
I have not seen this particular film, so I will limit my comments to the 'making of a bad guy'. We don't know the conscious or unconscious reasons that the filmakers had for picking a European for the role of the appeaser, (if the role was that--he may have been intended to be a thoughtful alternative to the American plan), but we should remeber that this is not journalism, it's purpose is not to document and inform, it's purpose, first and foremost, is to make money for the producers. It is not surprising that liberties might have been taken, I am apalled that a single passenger was singled out, by name, and placed in what may very well be a contrived part, (aiding the development of the drama); that the person happened to fall into an easily stereotyped category makes it all the worse. I agree that a 'composite' passenger would have been a better choice. Comments ()
Jamie Arpin-Ricci
- #10 - 2006-09-10 20:37 - (Reply)
Excellent and thorough piece. Some may argue that Europeans have characterized American victims of 9/11 with disrespect. This is true. However, people the world over have done this, including Americans themselves. Besides, even if it were true of only Europeans, it is a shallow argument to defend the insult against Christian Adams (& family) specifically, and Germans (& Europeans) in general. Comments ()
Anonymous
- #10.1 - 2006-09-10 20:49 - (Reply)
@ Jamie. Comments ()
Peejz
- #11 - 2006-09-10 20:45 - (Reply)
I did not go to the theater to see Flight 93. I watched a made for TV version of Flight 93 that came out before the motion picture. To be honest with you, I had not heard of Christian Adams prior to you bringing him up. Although there is no excuse for me not knowing that he was one of the passengers, I can see where your anger is coming from. Everyone on those planes made split second decisions. With all the hoopla surounding 'The Path To 9/11" a big part of the story is being missed. We Americans accepted those movies as 'the truth'. No one lived to tell of how Christian Adams acted or didn't act on that plane. The scenes on the plane are a best guess or made up. I would love to know why he was made to be the scapegoat! Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #12 - 2006-09-10 21:10 - (Reply)
[b]Welcome new readers! Comments ()
Maxim Gorky
- #13 - 2006-09-10 21:20 - (Reply)
Those cowardly Germans will never know what kind of bravery it takes to launch an invasion of a huge country like Iraq. Comments ()
pithie
- #13.1 - 2007-06-03 13:46 - (Reply)
A huge country like Iraq? Sorry to inform you my simple minded friend but Iraq is tiny compared to the US with a very small army, almost no airforce and absolutly no navy. Yes it was quite an achievment for america to take over it. You should be very proud of yourselves as they will probably be singing songs about it for many years to come. In fact heres a good title for a song. "The Bullies". what do you think? Comments ()
Zyme
- #14 - 2006-09-11 01:14 - (Reply)
Yes, those cowardly Germans know only what kind of bravery it takes to start a war with half of the world - repeatedly. Comments ()
Don
- #15 - 2006-09-11 01:22 - (Reply)
Two sentences from a movie are being inflated into a major issue - this by many of the same people who lionize Mikey Moore, a chap with a scrupulous regard for the truth and a revulsion for hype and dishonesty of all kinds. Comments ()
Fuchur
- #15.1 - 2006-09-11 21:41 - (Reply)
Don´t blame the Europeans for Michael Moore! He definitely belongs in your cage. Comments ()
Don
- #15.1.1 - 2006-09-12 00:59 - (Reply)
I don't blame Europeans for making Michael Moore; I blame them for worshiping him. Once upon a time I was a fan of his; "Roger & Me" was an excellent, funny, film asj=king a bloated plutocrat with a gigantic ego why he laid off the workers of Flint. Comments ()
Possum
- #16 - 2006-09-11 12:36 - (Reply)
Is there supposed to be some sort of moral equivalence I'm missing here ;-) Comments ()
Anonymous
- #16.1 - 2006-09-11 15:02 - (Reply)
What you insinuate is: Abusing Americans is bad. Abusing Germans is okay, because of Schroeder. Comments ()
Don
- #16.1.1 - 2006-09-12 02:21 - (Reply)
Nah. Abusing Americans is routine, and many Europeans regard it as only their just due. Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #16.1.1.1 - 2006-09-12 02:32 - (Reply)
It was more than that. You should see it. Why do you try to make it smaller? Comments ()
Don
- #16.1.1.1.1 - 2006-09-12 12:07 - (Reply)
Joerg, Comments ()
Fuchur
- #16.1.1.1.1.1 - 2006-09-12 14:28 - (Reply)
That´s rich. Comments ()
Don
- #16.1.1.1.1.1.1 - 2006-09-12 21:50 - (Reply)
So the americans are to blame for the contempt which many europeans direct at them? Comments ()
Zombie12toes
- #16.1.1.1.1.2 - 2006-09-12 17:32 - (Reply)
The French didn't gave their most prestigious award to Michael Moore's Farenheit 9/11. The French have nothing to do with it. The Cannes Festival is an international festival, and the award are given by a jury. That year, 2004, the jury was composed of : Comments ()
flocon
- #16.1.1.1.1.2.2 - 2006-09-13 22:19 - (Reply)
Salut zombie12toes! Comments ()
Zyme
- #17 - 2006-09-11 13:29 - (Reply)
Yet it is comforting to see that this issue got attention in the british media - in a positive way towards germany. Maybe a real kind of european identity is actually beginning to exist. Comments ()
Possum
- #18 - 2006-09-12 00:47 - (Reply)
Where’s the “defamation”? Old Europe condemns us for being such brash cowboys. Old Europe is supposed to be proud of behaving like this character did. Here ABC was just representing a European character behaving in the European way, the way you older, wiser peoples are so proud of. How can that be offensive to you? Comments ()
ADMIN
- #19 - 2006-09-12 01:52 - (Reply)
Please note that by default the comments in this blog are threaded rather than linear, i.e. some of the latest comments and responses to comments are not at the bottom, but in the middle of the thread. Comments ()
David
- #20 - 2006-09-12 13:51 - (Reply)
@Don & Possum, Comments ()
Don
- #20.1 - 2006-09-12 16:44 - (Reply)
Care to elucidate, David? Comments ()
Possum
- #20.2 - 2006-09-14 07:19 - (Reply)
Get your words out of my mouth. Can't you answer a point directly? Do you have to play this game of dodge? Meet a point head on, instead of slithering around it like sidewinder. Comments ()
Anonymous
- #21 - 2006-09-12 21:54 - (Reply)
@ Possum Comments ()
Larry
- #22 - 2006-09-12 23:10 - (Reply)
Ah let good old justice sort it out. Comments ()
End the war!
- #23 - 2006-09-13 02:10 - (Reply)
Being German, Comments ()
Don
- #23.1 - 2006-09-13 03:11 - (Reply)
Would you prefer to be known as a weasel or as a war criminal as Americans are? Comments ()
Sean Smith
- #24 - 2006-09-13 04:43 - (Reply)
I watched the movie last night. I think the portrayal of this man as a coward and impediment (if not an outright collaborator-appeaser) to the crew's effort to retake the plane is positively disgraceful. And I'm not a big fan of most of the European reaction to 9/11. If he wanted to make this microcosmic political point, Greengrass could have done so without slandering a real victim of the terrorists! Comments ()
John
- #25 - 2006-09-16 00:36 - (Reply)
One of the things I heard the most about after the film's premiere was the ineptness of the military and FAA response on that morning. Both that view and the view of Mr. Adams as portrayed in the film ignore the way the world was viewed before 9/11. As much as I hate to admit it, the terrorist plan was as unexpected as it was evil. Pre-9/11, all international threats to the U.S. came from overseas, where the military was usually focused. All hijackings ended with a plane on a tarmac somewhere and negotiations. That was protocol everywhere. In that light, the portrayal makes more sense, especially for Europeans, who had dealt with terrorism more than us by then. (Though I do agree the film makers might've taken it too far when he jumps up before the attack.) But even the most jaded American should admit, post-9/11, that hijackings will never work again, even on a domestic Lufthansa flight. If someone gets rowdy on a flight now, the passengers are kicking their ass, an air marshal has a gun to their head, and there's 2 fighters on their tail. We know it's different now. They know it's different now. The first people to know that were on Flight 93. All of them, including Mr. Adams, paid for that knowledge with their lives. Comments ()
German
- #26 - 2006-09-17 18:54 - (Reply)
I just don`t understand this discussion. Comments ()
Don
- #26.1 - 2006-09-17 21:00 - (Reply)
German, the Jews did finally fight - in the battle of the Warsaw Ghetto. Plus uncounted numbers of Jews who fought for the US, Britain, France, and Canada during WWII. Comments ()
Kim
- #26.1.1 - 2006-09-17 22:48 - (Reply)
Your right. Comments ()
Don
- #26.1.1.1 - 2006-09-18 11:44 - (Reply)
Kim, I haven't seen the movie, and even if I had I probably would not have found the Adams spoken part memorable enough to recall. Comments ()
JW-Atlantic Review
- #26.1.1.1.1 - 2006-09-18 13:33 - (Reply)
Don, Comments ()
Don
- #26.1.1.1.1.1 - 2006-09-20 00:28 - (Reply)
"I am certain you would make a much bigger issue out of this than we Europeans did, if an American 9/11 victim would have been defamed in a European movie" Comments ()
Vince Di Placido
- #26.1.1.1.2 - 2006-09-30 13:37 - (Reply)
Think of America's un-involvement in World War II until 2 years in, when Pearl Harbour was attacked, despite Germany rampaging through Europe & bombing Britain! Do not now criticise some European nations for not charging in with the America! I wish there had been no Character given the fictional scenario of Pacifism on United 93(although there must have been some who were cautious of rushing a cockpit in a situation they couldn't have fully understood) Comments ()
Don
- #26.1.1.1.2.1 - 2006-10-07 01:06 - (Reply)
"Think of America's un-involvement in World War II until 2 years in, when Pearl Harbour was attacked, despite Germany rampaging through Europe & bombing Britain!" Comments ()
gracchi
- #27 - 2006-09-27 12:34 - (Reply)
Good post. There are real problems in making real events into films especially one with people whose relatives are still alive involved- it sometimes works I think better to invent the whole group of people which avoids the problems in this article. I'm not sure that there is anyway that this film could have been made without dishonouring somebody's relative without anyone knowing which passengers didn't fight. Comments ()
Rich
- #28 - 2006-09-28 03:28 - (Reply)
Basically, the whole movie is fiction. There was no passenger fightback - Flight 93 was shot down by fighter aircraft. Comments ()
Anonymous
- #28.1 - 2006-10-03 13:04 - (Reply)
Agreed, Rich. Comments ()
rich
- #29 - 2006-10-06 18:56 - (Reply)
about the film´s non-controversy in Germany. Comments ()
Holger
- #30 - 2006-11-08 16:33 - (Reply)
Being a German myself, I wouldn't even mind the depiciton of a German as a de-escalating figure or even a coward if this was pure fiction. After all, Mogadishu was successful, and Germans have, in recent decades and for good or for bad, developed a mentality of keeping out. Since, however, the movie is supposed to be based on facts, and under the circumstances of 9/11, it brings shame to a real family living not too far from where I live, who not only have to suffer the loss of a family member in a terrorist attack in a distant country, but now even his unfounded portrayal as a coward. Comments ()
dlp
- #31 - 2007-02-26 22:46 - (Reply)
The film makers were wrong to single out an individual whose family had opted out of the UAL93 families' agreement to support the making of the film. In this way they are no different from the makers of Futurama (who decided to trash Jimmy Doohan on screen when he didn't participate in their Star Trek parody episode). It was also a symptom of backsliding into the "Airport 19??" syndrome which dictates that there will always be a coward on board whose nerves will crack and cause some dramatic conflict. This being said, I don't remember ANY characters being introduced by name. You have to be an expert on this flight to know that there was a single individual victim who fit the profile of the "cracked" character. I am a film nitpicker who only found out about this controversy by entering "coward United 93" into Google because I knew this episode had to be fictional. I myself thought the comments about Mogadishu were reasonable - Europeans have had more recent experiences with hijacking situations. However, the warning before the attack was pure (and disappointing) Hollywood. The truth is that we don't know what happened on that flight except for phone calls from passengers and FA, the flight data recorder, inadvertant "hot mike" from the Al-Quedans, and the cockpit voice recorder. The CVR was possibly unreleased at the time of this film - witness that the crew may not have been dragged from the cockpit and may have tried to interfere with the hijackers when the passenger attack began. I wish that the film had incorporated this possibility as well. The "standoff" between frightened passengers and frightened hijackers is just a plausible scenario, not reality. It would have been nice for the film makers to admit this in a postscript. Comments ()
Aaron Tom
- #32 - 2007-02-27 08:42 - (Reply)
I saw it, and this thought never crossed my mind. Maybe it did happen this way, maybe it didn't. There are certainly some artistic licenses that movies are entitled to. Maybe it was a coincidence. I do find the articles defending of Christian Adams character to be ridiculous: Comments ()
Anonymous
- #33 - 2007-02-27 20:09 - (Reply)
Here's an interesting twist: the decision of to make the German victim into the classic Airport 19?? character who cracks under pressure was made by the German actor who played him. Greenglass allowed the actors to improvise their performances based on what they knew about "their" victim. In most cases, that knowledge was based on communication with the families, but not in the case of Christian Adams. Thus, the actor himself decided to chew some scenary and give an otherwise excellent docudrama an unneeded "Hollywood" dimension. Greenglass' responsibility is that he did nothing to curb this guy's performance. It's a little similar to what Orlando Jones did for the "character" of Jar-Jar Binks in Star Wars I, leading to endless tirades about Lucas' bigotry. Maybe all movies need a PC consultant (not talking about computers here) as well as a technical advisor :). Comments ()
Anonymous
- #34 - 2007-03-19 06:38 - (Reply)
I found that post, after watching the film. I can sincerely say that it's sadly easy to find the hidden intention in the picture of the German character. Comments ()
Reverend Thomas
- #35 - 2007-09-11 09:51 - (Reply)
Could those caring people who are concerned with the psychological effects on all of the people affected by the 911 World Trade Centre terrorism attack please join with me and support the victims and their families by sending them a “Blessing from God” certificate from the website http://www.godsblessingsforyou.co Comments ()
Peter
- #36 - 2009-01-28 19:52 - (Reply)
REVISED ENTRY Comments ()
|
Contact UsEmail Joerg Wolf and Kyle Atwell at:
ar-team AT atlanticreview.org We are available for interviews, and appreciate feedback and suggestions. Subscribe and FollowWelcome!
You are reading the ATLANTIC REVIEW, a Press Digest on Transatlantic Relations combined with commentary and analysis. More about us. Follow Atlantic Review on Facebook or on Twitter. Subscribe to one of our RSS-Feeds or to our newsletter. SponsorSUPPORT THIS SITEBlogrollHot TopicsClick on one of the following links to see all Atlantic Review posts about this topic in a chronological order with the latest post on top:
Afghanistan Anti-Americanism Economics Iran Iraq Merkel Polls Terrorism Click here for the full list of all topics. |
Home - About Us - Newsletter - Transatlantic Relations - US Foreign Policy - Various RSS Feeds Designed for Atlantic Review by Carl.


We watched Flight 93 last night. Sober, impressive stuff. By coincidence I've just been alerted to Atlantic Review's post about the other, much more widely publicised hijacking film, Paul Greengrass's United 93 (which I still haven't seen, alas.) Ahead of Comments ()
Tracked: Sep 10, 14:34