For
example, in July 2005, a Treasury official testified before
Congress that Saudi Arabia-based and - funded organizations remain a
key source for the promotion of ideologies used by terrorists and
violent extremists around the world to justify their agenda. In
addition, according to State’s 2005 International Narcotics
Control Strategy Report, Saudi donors and unregulated charities have
been a major source of financing to extremist and terrorist groups over
the past 25 years. In July 2003, a former State Department official
testified before Congress that a Saudi-based charity, al Haramain
Islamic Foundation, had allegedly financed assistance to the Egyptian
terrorist group Gamma al Islamia. In May 2004, the same former State
official also testified that some half dozen of the most visible
charities, including two of Saudi Arabia’s largest, the
International Islamic Relief Organization and the World Muslim League,
have been linked to supporting Islamic terrorist organizations
globally. In addition, a former Treasury official identified
Wa’el Hamza Julaidan as a senior figure in the Saudi
charitable community who provided financial and other support to
several terrorist groups affiliated with al Qaeda operating primarily
in the Balkans. Moreover, the 9/11 Commission report states that al
Qaeda raised money in Saudi Arabia directly from individuals and
through charities.
According to Rachel
Ehrenfeld's Front
Page Magazine
article:
Former
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency Director James Woolsey testified
before the U.S. House of Representatives’ Committee on
Government Reform in April this year that “Some $85-90 billion
has been spent from sources in Saudi Arabia in the last 30 years,
spreading Wahhabi beliefs throughout the world.”
The U.S. National Intelligence Reform Act of December 2004 requires
development of a Presidential strategy to confront Islamic extremism,
in collaboration with Saudi Arabia. So far, says a September Government
Accounting Office (GAO) report,
U.S. agencies have been unable to determine the extent of Saudi
Arabia’s domestic and international cooperation.
(...)
Under U.S. pressure, Saudi Arabia declared repeatedly that it would
close some charities identified as spreading Wahhabism and funding
terrorism. However, the GAO report notes that “in May 2005,
...it was unclear whether the government of Saudi Arabia had
implemented its plans.” Despite Saudi promises to establish a
new National Commission for Relief and Charity Work Abroad, the GAO
said: “as of July 2005, this commission was not yet fully
operational.” At least two members of the Saudi government,
Riyadh Governor Prince Salman and Minister of Defense Prince Sultan,
are sponsors of the Saudi High Commission, which evidence in the 9/11
victims lawsuits shows “has long acted as a fully integrated
component of al-Qaeda’s logistical and financial support
infrastructure.” Moreover, the lawsuits detail that
“the Sept. 11 attacks were a direct, intended and foreseeable
product of [the High Commission’s] participation in
al-Qaeda’s jihadist campaign.”
Law.com reports that this "charity"
cannot be sued for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks because of the Foreign
Sovereign Immunities Act, a federal judge has ruled. Southern District
of New York Judge Richard Conway Casey found that the Saudi High
Commission was shielded from suit under the act because it presented a
prima facie case that it is a foreign sovereign. Because
the Saudi High
Commission "was formed by order of the Kingdom's governing body, it
provides the Kingdom's aid to Bosnia, it is governed by a Saudi
official and its employees are civil servants, it is an organ of the
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Casey wrote in three of the several cases
connected to the Sept. 11 attacks that have been consolidated before
him by the Panel on Multi-District Litigation under 03 MDL 1570. The
court also found that the Saudi High Commission has not waived its
sovereign immunity. "
American Future refers to a Freedom House
report, that
provides
voluminous documentary evidence that dozens of mosques in major cities
across America are distributing documents, bearing the seal of the
government of Saudi Arabia, that incite Muslims to acts of violence and
promote hatred of Jews and Christians.
A hearing by the U.S.
Senate Judiciary Committee on Saudi incitement in U.S. mosques
scheduled for October 25th was cancelled unexpectedly. Israpundit believes:
This
hearing would have exposed Saudi support for the wrathful dogma of
Wahhabism, the rejection of the co-existence of different religions and
condemnation of Christians, Jews, and all other non Muslims. It would
have revealed their attempts to instill contempt for America and its
non Wahhabi-style of government.
According to the State
Department, religious
freedom is non-existent
in Saudi Arabia.
While Eritrea was punished for
lack of religious freedom under the Religious Freedom of Information
Act, Saudi Arabia got another waiver for half a year. The San
Antonio Express-News editorilized
on October 17th:
Late
last month, the State
Department informed Congress it was placing commercial sanctions on the
tiny East African nation of Eritrea for violations of religious
freedom. The export of certain defense items to Eritrea is now banned,
marking the first sanctions enacted under the International Religious
Freedom Act of 1998.Under the terms of that act, the State Department
is to issue an annual survey of religious freedom. In its report to
Congress one year ago, the State Department cited Eritrea, Vietnam and
Saudi Arabia as nations lacking religious freedom. In Saudi Arabia, in
fact, the report said religious freedom is nonexistent.
While
Eritrea is now
facing sanctions and Vietnam made commitments to improve religious
freedom earlier this year, the Bush administration has given Saudi
Arabia another 180-day waiver from sanctions. Moreover, the Pentagon
has informed Congress of its intention to sell more than $2 billion worth
of military equipment to the desert kingdom.
By
failing to confront
Saudi Arabia about its religious intolerance, the Bush administration isn't just
violating the spirit — if not the letter — of the
International Religious Freedom Act. It is also hindering efforts to
deal with the ideological sources of terrorism. Religious
extremism that originates in Saudi Arabia provides theological and
financial sustenance for terrorist organizations such as al-Qaida.
Punishing religious intolerance in Eritrea while ignoring the much
greater problem in Saudi Arabia makes a travesty of the International
Religious Freedom Act.
State Department
Deputy Spokesman Adam Ereli told the Voice
of America
that
American
diplomats intend
to engage Saudi authorities in the coming months with the hope of
developing a plan of action to deal with U.S. concerns, including
allowing other religious groups to hold public worship sessions, and
giving them the right to possess their respective holy books and other
religious documents.
The
Daily Demarche writes about the oppression of Saudi women.
It's even worse for many migrants: The US
State Deportment's annual
survey of international human
trafficking states:
Saudi Arabia is a destination for men and women
from South and East Asia
and East Africa trafficked for the purpose of labor
exploitation, and for children from Yemen,
Afghanistan, and Africa trafficking for forced begging. Hundreds of thousands of
low-skilled workers
from India, Indonesia, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh,
Ethiopia,
Eritrea, Somalia, and Kenya migrate voluntarily to Saudi Arabia; some
fall into
conditions of involuntary servitude, suffering from physical and sexual
abuse,
non-payment or delayed payment of wages, the withholding of travel
documents,
restrictions on their freedom of movement and non-consensual contract
alterations.
The Government of Saudi Arabia
does not comply with
the minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking and is not
making
significant efforts to do so. Saudi Arabia
has moved from Tier 2 to Tier 3 because
of its lack of progress in anti-trafficking efforts, particularly its
failure
to protect victims and prosecute those guilty of involuntary servitude.
Criminal cases are adjudicated under
Sharia law, and
there is no evidence trafficking victims are accorded legal assistance
before
and during Sharia legal proceedings. The government should consider
adopting
comprehensive anti-trafficking legislation that would punish
traffickers,
provide for the protection of victims, and facilitate prevention
programs. It
should also collect and disseminate data on prosecution and mediation
efforts,
prosecute aggressively cases of physical and sexual abuse using
available
criminal laws, and increase its efforts to prevent and investigate the
trafficking of children for forced begging.
Saudi Arabia is one 14 countries failing
to do enough to stop
the modern-day slave trade in
prostitutes, child sex workers and forced laborers, wrote The
Boston Globe on
June 3,
2005:
Three
other U.S.
allies in the Middle East -- Kuwait,
the United Arab Emirates
and
Qatar
-- were newly listed this year as nations that are failing to
adequately
address trafficking problems. The
State Department said the 14 countries could
be subject to sanctions if they do not crack down.
Did
Saudi Arabia implement the US recommendations in the meantime? The SF
Chronicle wrote about the US
administration's conclusions three
months after the publication of the State Department survey:
Of
those 14, Bush concluded that
Bolivia,
Jamaica,
Qatar,
Sudan,
Togo
and the United Arab Emirates
had made enough
improvements to avoid any cut in U.S.
aid or, in the case of
countries that get no American financial assistance, the barring of
their
officials from cultural and educational events, said Darla Jordan, a
State
Department spokeswoman.
Cambodia and Venezuela were not considered to have
made similar adequate
improvements. But Bush cleared them nonetheless to receive limited
assistance,
for such things as combatting trafficking. In the case of Venezuela
— which has
had a tense relationship with the United States under the leadership of
President Hugo Chavez, one of Latin America's most outspoken critics of
U.S.
foreign policy — Bush also allowed funding for strengthening
the political
party system and supporting electoral observation.
In addition to Saudi Arabia,
Ecuador and Kuwait — another
U.S. ally in the Middle East — were given a complete pass on
any sanctions,
Jordan said. Despite periodic differences, oil-rich Saudi Arabia and
the United
States have a tight alliance built on economic and military
cooperation.
That left Myanmar, Cuba and North Korea as the only
nations in the list of
14 barred completely from receiving certain kinds of foreign aid.
Perhaps the Bush administration did
not sanction anti-American Venezuela and Saudi Arabia, because the US
imports so much oil from these countries. According to the Department
of Energy:
During the first five months of 2005, Saudi Arabia exported 1.57
million bbl/d of oil (of which 1.51 million bbl/d was crude) to the
United States. For this time period, Saudi Arabia ranked fourth (after
Canada, Mexico, and Venezuela) as a source of total (crude plus refined
products) U.S. oil imports, and third for crude only.
Saudi Arabia is
eager to maintain and even expand its market share in the United States
for a variety of economic and strategic reasons. During the first five
months of 2005, Saudi Arabia's share of U.S. crude oil imports was 14.9
percent, up from 13.9 percent during the first five months of 2004.
The Department
of Energy
believes
Oil
is the lifeblood of America’s economy. Currently,
it supplies more than 40% of our total energy demands and more than 99%
of the fuel we use in our cars and trucks.
Oil, however, fuels
the United States and Europe's foes as well. In August The Atlantic
Review wrote that SUV
drivers undermine US foreign policy
by strengthenening anti-American and anti-democratic forces in oil rich
countries. Europe and the US seem to be addicted to oil and
unable to pursue their national interests and moral principles in
regard to oil-rich countries.
Once Upon A time, In A Land Far Away... A regional panjandrum by the improbable name of Muhammad bin Saud met a fellow panjandrum cum mystic, then a radical islamist, by the equally improbable name of Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab and decided together that the Arabian Peninsula had just too much freedom in the way Islam was practiced. Deciding that... Comments ()
Tracked: Nov 04, 20:14
The Atlantic Review presents a very thoughtful topic about how the US - and Europe - seem to prefer oil access to security. Comments ()
Tracked: Nov 06, 22:37
At his State of the Union Address, President Bush promised "to replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports from the Middle East by 2025", because "America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world.&quo Comments ()
Tracked: Feb 02, 11:39
John Crewdson, the senior correspondent of the respectable Chicago Tribune, claims to have obtained a "classified report from the office of German Chancellor Angela Merkel":According to the report, 206 international telephone calls were known to Comments ()
Tracked: Mar 12, 21:55