|
< Previous Post | Next Post >
Friday, July 25. 2008By Giving a Speech in Berlin, Obama is Playing with FirePosted by Editors in Transatlantic Relations, US Domestic and Cultural Issues on Friday, July 25. 2008
As a journalist who covers U.S-European relations and as a U.S. citizen who hopes for better relations with Europe in the next administration, it was quite gratifying to see so many Berliners waving American flags to greet U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama in Tiergarten yesterday. Too often in the last eight years, Germany has greeted American politicians with disinterest, disdain or worse. The images of Obama standing in front of hundreds of thousands of cheering Germans are spectacular and a reminder that an American politician is still welcome on foreign shores. Many believe Obama's German reception is a harbinger of things to come. There is a general sense in the media and among Obama campaign volunteers I've spoken with that if Obama were to win the presidency there would be a sea change in European-U.S. relations. One volunteer I met with recently said the feeling inside the campaign was that an Obama presidency would start a new age of cooperation between the United States and countries like Germany and that many of the disagreements of the past eight years would be set aside. A new course would be charted with both sides agreeing on the way forward. It is easy to understand why this volunteer believes in this cooperation after seeing the reception Obama received in Berlin. However, this reception needs to be put into context. Obama's message of change is one that is embraced by Germans, who vehemently opposed the large majority, if not all, of George W. Bush¹s policies. Therefore, any change is a welcome change, especially if it comes in the form of a charismatic figure like Obama. However, Obama's popularity should not be interpreted as a shift in German policy towards the United States. Many officials I spoke with while reporting from Berlin earlier this year said Germany will continue to act in its own interests no matter who is in the White House. Any debt owed to the United States for its role in ending the Cold War has been paid in full, they said. It is doubtful that Germany, if Obama is elected, would send more troops to Afghanistan, as this idea is wildly unpopular with the German public. Nor would the German government decide to scuttle the Baltic Sea pipeline. Both of these moves would be more in line with U.S. policy. Obama might be as popular as Elvis, but even the King couldn¹t wean Germany off of Russian energy. Two more things to consider: First, an Obama victory is not guaranteed. It is obvious that he is the popular choice among the chattering classes and the foreign policy community in the United States. But so was John Kerry four years ago. Obama might be popular on U.S. coasts, but U.S. elections are won along the Rust Belt in the Midwest, the steel factory workers in Pennsylvania and Ohio, and the rural South. This part of the country is still undecided on Obama. Second, the Republicans could use this speech as a way to portray Obama as out-of-touch with working class Americans. Kerry answered one question in French during the 2004 campaign, and within weeks, the Republican public relations machine had many voters convinced that the democratic nominee was actually from France. There is always a danger in a modern-day presidential candidate appearing as "too European." By giving a speech in Berlin, Obama is playing with fire. There is little doubt that the next U.S. president will be more welcome than George W. Bush has been in Europe and around the world. However, it is important to remember that any U.S. president not named Bush would receive a hero's welcome abroad. My hope for the next U.S. president, whether it is Republican nominee John McCain or Obama, is that they can repair the relationships that have been battered over the last eight years. A more friendly dialogue would lead to a more honest policy discussion and allow the United States to better understand its European allies and discover areas where the two sides can once again move forward together. David Francis received a John C. McCloy Journalism Fellowship to report on the European Union's growing dependence on Russian energy and its effect on transatlantic relations. Learn more about him at his homepage. Previously, David has written this post for Atlantic Review in March 2008: In Berlin, Outrage Over Nord Stream Deal Seems to Have Died Trackbacks
Trackback specific URI for this entry
No Trackbacks
Comments
Display comments as
(Linear | Threaded)
franchie
- #1 - 2008-07-25 12:25 - (Reply)
I am afraid that Obama is already categorised as a "French" Comments ()
Joe Noory
- #1.1 - 2008-07-25 13:22 - (Reply)
You may be able to find some comment made by someone somewhere on the internet, but it's ridiculously self-important to think that he's been catagorized in a way that gives the French some reason to dwell on themselves in reference to anything going on in the world. Comments ()
franchie
- #1.1.1 - 2008-07-25 18:50 - (Reply)
that's why his advisers told him not to be grandiloquent in France, that could cost him the office, as it did for Kerry, thas was too much connoted "french" Comments ()
Zyme
- #2 - 2008-07-25 19:26 - (Reply)
There is a nice online survey at FAZ.de (conservative national newpaper) about Obama`s visit in Germany, asking "whether the attention to Obama's visit is justified". Comments ()
David
- #3 - 2008-07-25 20:17 - (Reply)
Most Americans share the European yearnings for better transatlantic relations. Every poll taken in the last 12 months shows that 3/4 of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track. There is a widespread feeling here that Bush botched foreign relations (and not just with Europe) just as he botched the economy. So, many Americans are pleased to see crowds of people in Europe cheering an American political figure and waving American flags (even if they don't support Obama). That is welcome change indeed. Comments ()
Pat Patterson
- #4 - 2008-07-25 21:38 - (Reply)
So the Gallup Poll, taken before the speech, shows an improvement because of the speech? Now that is impressive! Why bother to hold an election and just schedule an apotheosis for Sen. Obama? He won't need a motorcade because he'll simply walk across the Potomac! Comments ()
Pat Patterson
- #4.1 - 2008-08-01 22:28 - (Reply)
Since I noticed that David did not do any follow up to the claimed trend of approval of Sen. Obama's tour and speech a little more info is probably necessary. There was a nice little bounce on Sunday after the speech but in the three days since, the Gallup Poll released today, and which covered July 9th through the 31st, now shows that the race is dead even though it has been statistically tied since Tuesday. In other words a nine day Phileas Fogg scramble produced...nothing! Well, that's not completely true, Sen. Obama is actually worse off now than before. Comments ()
John Veit
- #5 - 2008-11-18 18:00 - (Reply)
OBAMA RALLY ELECTION NIGHT NOTES Comments ()
|
Contact UsEmail Joerg Wolf and Kyle Atwell at:
ar-team AT atlanticreview.org We are available for interviews, and appreciate feedback and suggestions. Subscribe and FollowWelcome!
You are reading the ATLANTIC REVIEW, a Press Digest on Transatlantic Relations combined with commentary and analysis. More about us. Follow Atlantic Review on Facebook or on Twitter. Subscribe to one of our RSS-Feeds or to our newsletter. SponsorSUPPORT THIS SITEBlogrollHot TopicsClick on one of the following links to see all Atlantic Review posts about this topic in a chronological order with the latest post on top:
Afghanistan Anti-Americanism Economics Iran Iraq Merkel Polls Terrorism Click here for the full list of all topics. |
Home - About Us - Newsletter - Transatlantic Relations - US Foreign Policy - Various RSS Feeds Designed for Atlantic Review by Carl.

